LightBlog

lundi 27 juin 2022

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 vs Jabra Elite 85T: Which TWS should you choose?

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 and the Jabra Elite 85T are two of the best true wireless earbuds on the market, offering great sound, ergonomic designs, and effective ANC. The Galaxy Buds 2 was unveiled alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3. Meanwhile, the Jabra Elite 85T came out in 2020 and is comparatively older than the Galaxy Buds 2. However, Jabra continues to promote it as the flagship product. Both earbuds have strengths and weaknesses, but which one comes out on top? We find out in this head-to-head comparison.

Galaxy Buds 2 Vs. Jabra Elite 85T: Specifications

Specification Galaxy Buds 2 Jabra Elite 85T
Build and Weight
  • 17 x 20.9mm (earbud)
  • 50.2 x 50 x 27.8mm (case)
  • 5g (earbud)
  • 41.2g (earbud)
  • 23.1 x 19.0 x 16.2mm (earbud)
  • 64.8 x 41.1 x 28.5mm (charging case)
  • 7g (earbud)
  • 45.1 (charging case)
Audio
  • Dynamic 2-way speakers
    • 11mm Woofer
    • 6.5mm Tweeter
  • 12mm dynamic drivers
ANC
  • Yes, ANC supported
  • 3 levels of ambient sound control
  • Ambient sound/transparency mode
  • Machine Learning solutions to cut-off sound
  • Yes, ANC supported
  • HearThrough (transparency) mode
  • Adjustable mode
Microphone
  • 3 microphones (each earbud)
  • 3 microphones (each earbud)
Connectivity
  • Bluetooth 5.2
  • Bluetooth 5.1
Battery & charging
  • 5 hours of playback with ANC
  • 20 hours of total playback (with charging case)
  • 5.5 hours of playback with ANC
  • 31 hours of total playback (with charging case)
IP rating
  • IPX2
  • IPX4
Colors
  • White, Olive, Graphite, Lavender
  • Titanium Black, Gold Beige, Copper Black, Grey

Design, comfort, and IP rating

On paper, the Galaxy Buds 2 and Jabra Elite 85T both promise to be lightweight and comfortable. But looking at the numbers, the Galaxy Buds 2 have an edge here as they weigh just 5g making them 2g lighter than the Elite 85T. As far as looks are concerned, both earphones follow a similar design, but the Galaxy Buds 2 look more modern and eye-catching thanks to their rounded design that extends to the charging case.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 in lavender

The Jabra Elite 85T has oblong ear tips along with an earwax guard that prevents dirt, debris, and gunk from blocking the speaker grille. The Galaxy Buds 2 goes with the standard circular ear tips. To help you choose the appropriate tip, Samsung’s app also has an ear tip test.

When it comes to controls, both earbuds take a different approach; the Galaxy Buds 2 have touch gestures, so there’s a chance that they might sometimes register accidental or false taps. You’re unlikely to run into this issue on the Jabra Elite 85T as they use good old physical buttons, but that also means you need to apply a slight pressure to activate them, risking them unsettling from your ears.

Both earbuds have an IP rating for water and sweat protection, but Jabra Elite 85T fare better as they merit an IPX4 rating as compared to the IPX2-certified Galaxy Buds 2. That means they’re better suited for intense workouts and outdoor activity.

Sound quality, ANC, and calling experience

Both earbuds differ when it comes to the audio driver setup. The Galaxy Buds 2 features dynamic two-way speakers, consisting of an 11mm woofer for bass and midrange and a 6.5mm tweeter to handle high frequencies. The Jabra Elite 85T has the more traditional setup, featuring a single 12mm dynamic driver in each earbud. The Galaxy Buds 2 clearly have superior hardware, but remember that a lot depends on the audio tuning.

Jabra Elite 85t range Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 in all four colors

Should you not like the sound quality out of the box, both Samsung and Jabra give you a lot of customization options via their companion apps, allowing you to tweak the audio to your liking and play around with different sound profiles.

Coming to active noise cancellation (ANC), both earbuds claim to deliver powerful ANC performance. Samsung says the Galaxy Buds 2 can reduce the external noise by up to 98% though that doesn’t mean they can completely isolate you from the outside world — you’ll still hear people’s voices and high-pitched noise.

The Jabra Elite 85T has a dedicated processor for noise cancellation, and you can control the level of ANC from the Sound+ app. They also have pressure relief vents to reduce pressure build-up in the ear caused by the tight seal and ANC.

Both earbuds offer adjustable transparency or ambient mode to let you easily listen to surrounding sounds and people’s voices without taking off the earphones. For calling, the Galaxy Buds 2 use two beam-forming microphones and a built-in voice pickup unit. In addition, there’s a machine-learning-based solution that cuts down on external sound.

The Jabra Elite 85T use similar beam-forming microphones along with advanced wind-protection and noise reduction algorithms to cancel out wind noise and unwanted surround sound.

Battery life & other features

In terms of battery life, we’re looking at 5 hours of play time with the Galaxy Buds 2 with ANC on and 5.5 hours with the Jabra Elite 85T. While these numbers are close, the Galaxy Buds 2 lag behind when it comes to total endurance, delivering up to 20 hours of playback with the charging case. That’s 11 hours short of what the Jabra Elite 85T promises (up to 31 hours with the case). Both earbuds offer Qi wireless charging and USB-C wired charging.

Other notable highlights of the Galaxy Buds 2 include Bluetooth 5.2 support, IPX2 rating, 360 Audio, Bixby/Assistant integration, and support for SBC, AAC, and Samsung Scalable codecs.

As for the Jabra Elite 85T, you get Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity, multipoint support, SBC and AAC codecs, IPX4 rating, and Assistant/Siri support.

Conclusion

The Galaxy Buds 2 and Jabra Elite 85T are both capable true wireless earbuds with a solid set of features. But overall, we think the Galaxy Buds 2 are a better deal as they’re reasonably priced and offer the best bang for your buck. Originally launched at $149, they’re often on sale for $100-110 on Amazon (also check out the best Galaxy Buds 2 cases). The ecosystem integration with Samsung Galaxy smartphones also makes them a good option if you have a Samsung device. If you want solid battery life and are planning to use your earbuds for intense physical activity, then Jabra Elite 85T fit the bill better. They have IPX4 water resistance (Vs. IPX2 on the Galaxy Buds 2) and provide up to 31 hours of playback. Their original price is $229 but is routinely on sale for $149.

    Samsung Galaxy Buds 2
    The Galaxy Buds 2 offer effective ANC, two-way speakers, and up to 20 hours of battery life
    Jabra Elite 85T
    The Jabra Elite 85T are premium true wireless earbuds with 12mm dynamic drivers, powerful ANC, and 31 hours of battery life.

Here’s a quick rundown of what we like and dislike about both earphones.

What we like about the Galaxy Buds 2:

  • Lightweight and eye-catching
  • Superior audio driver setup
  • Effective ANC and ambient sound mode

What we don’t like:

  • Subpar total battery life
  • Lack of iOS app support

What we like about the Jabra Elite 85T:

  • Ergonomic design
  • Long-lasting battery life
  • IPX4 rating

What we don’t like:

  • A bit dated look
  • Expensive

Which earphone would you pick? Let us know in the comments below!

The post Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 vs Jabra Elite 85T: Which TWS should you choose? appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/6Ibqr3T
via IFTTT

How to download Android 13 for Google Pixel and other Android devices

Get ready to dig into Android 13! The next major release of Google’s OS is now available as a beta. For lucky owners of the Google Pixel 6, Pixel 6 Pro, Pixel 5a, Pixel 5, Pixel 4a 5G, Pixel 4a, Pixel 4, or Pixel 4 XL, you’ll be among the first users to see what Android 13 “Tiramisu” has to offer.

Alongside the supported Google Pixel devices, Android 13 is also available for a wide range of devices from different OEMs through Developer Preview programs.

Keep in mind that the preview builds won’t give you the full Android 13 experience as it’s very much a work-in-progress. The beta is aimed solely at developers, since they need to test their apps against new Android platform APIs months before the next Android version becomes available for the general public. Installing the Developer Preview/Beta on your daily driver isn’t recommended, as you might face various system instabilities. Do back up your data before proceeding.

This page will serve as a one-stop download index for every Android 13 build released by Google. We will keep the page updated with the latest OTAs and factory images for the supported Pixel smartphones. You can learn how to install Android 13 on Google Pixel smartphones and other devices by visiting our dedicated guide.

Navigate this page:


Download Android 13 for Google Pixel devices

Android 13 Beta 3.2 (TPB3.220610.004)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the beta 3.2 build of Android 13 from the index below:

You can also download the official Generic System Image (GSI) packages from the index below:

GSI Downloads

Architecture GSI Package
x86_64+GMS Download Link
ARM64+GMS Download Link
x86_64 Download Link
ARM64 Download Link

Android 13 Beta 3.1 (TPB3.220513.017.B1)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the beta 3.1 build of Android 13 from the index below:

You can also download the official Generic System Image (GSI) packages from the index below:

GSI Downloads

Architecture GSI Package
x86_64+GMS Download Link
ARM64+GMS Download Link
x86_64 Download Link
ARM64 Download Link

Android 13 Beta 3 (TPB3.220513.017)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the third beta build of Android 13 from the index below:

You can also download the official Generic System Image (GSI) packages from the index below:

GSI Downloads

Architecture GSI Package
x86_64+GMS Download Link
ARM64+GMS Download Link
x86_64 Download Link
ARM64 Download Link

Android 13 Beta 2.1 (TPBB.220414.018)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the beta 2.1 build of Android 13 from the index below:


Android 13 Beta 2 (TPBB.220414.015)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the second beta build of Android 13 from the index below:

You can also download the official Generic System Image (GSI) packages from the index below:

GSI Downloads

Architecture GSI Package
x86_64+GMS Download Link
ARM64+GMS Download Link
x86_64 Download Link
ARM64 Download Link

Android 13 Beta 1 (TPB1.220310.029)

For eligible Google Pixel devices, you can download the first beta build of Android 13 from the index below:

You can also download the official Generic System Image (GSI) packages from the index below:

GSI Downloads

Architecture GSI Package
x86_64+GMS Download Link
ARM64+GMS Download Link
x86_64 Download Link
ARM64 Download Link

Android 13 Developer Preview builds

If you need to download older Developer Preview builds, you can found them listed below:


Additionally, Google offers ready-to-use Android 13 beta system images under the Android Emulator in Android Studio. A beta for Android TV is available as well.

The post How to download Android 13 for Google Pixel and other Android devices appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/5JpwgTY
via IFTTT

The Pixel 6a reportedly features a faster, more reliable fingerprint scanner

Google showcased its latest Pixel device, the Pixel 6a, during the I/O 2022 keynote earlier this year. While the device is yet to make its way to the market, we’ve already seen plenty of leaks about it. A few weeks ago, Malaysian YouTuber Fazli Halim gave us a thorough look at the latest affordable Pixel in a hands-on video. Now, they’ve shared a full review of the device, which highlights that its fingerprint scanner is faster than the one on Google’s flagship Pixel 6 Pro.

For the unaware, the fingerprint scanner on the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro has been in the news ever since the devices hit the shelves last year. Shortly after the devices went on sale, we saw several reports suggesting that the in-display fingerprint scanner on the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro felt sluggish compared to other premium flagships.

Google also acknowledged the issue and shared some details about why the fingerprint scanner on its latest flagships might feel slow at times. Despite these claims, Google released a software update to improve the fingerprint scanner performance on the Pixel 6 series in November last year. However, the update did not make much of an improvement.

When Google lifted the covers off the Pixel 6a at I/O this year, many wondered whether the cheaper device would feature a better in-display fingerprint scanner. Turns out, it does. YouTuber Fazli Halim’s review of the Pixel 6a includes a side-by-side comparison of the fingerprint scanners on the Pixel 6 Pro and the Pixel 6a.

As you can see in the attached video, the fingerprint scanner on the newer model is not only faster but also a bit more accurate than the one on the Pixel 6 Pro. The device unlocks even with a quick tap on the fingerprint scanner, while the Pixel 6 Pro displays a “Hold a little longer” prompt at the bottom of the display. At the moment, we’re not sure if Google implemented a software fix on the Pixel 6a to achieve better results or opted for a new, more reliable in-display fingerprint scanner altogether. We expect to find out when the Pixel 6a officially goes on sale next month.


Via: 9to5Google

The post The Pixel 6a reportedly features a faster, more reliable fingerprint scanner appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/ZD2qRXd
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: Samsung and Apple battle it out in the entry level flagship space

Samsung’s Galaxy S22 and Apple’s iPhone 13 are aimed at two groups of consumers: those who want a “new flagship” but don’t want to pay too much or consumers who don’t want a huge flagship phone. With both devices priced at $699 right now and with “just” 6.1-inch screens (this is measured diagonally, so the actual height of the phones is well under 6-inches), these two easily fit the needs of those two groups.

    Samsung Galaxy S22
    The entry level series in Samsung's 2022 flagship line, the S22 may not be ultra or even a plus, but it still brings a brilliant screen, top-end SoC, and strong camera performance across the board.
    Apple iPhone 13
    The Apple iPhone 13 offers the supremely powerful A15 Bionic silicon and a really good main camera in an affordable package.

iphone 13 and s22

Navigate this article:


Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: Specifications

Specifications Samsung Galaxy S22 Apple iPhone 13
Build
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Gorilla Glass Victus back
  • Gorilla Glass Victus front
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Glass front and back
  • “Ceramic Shield” for front glass
Dimensions & Weight
  • 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm
  • 168 gram
  • 146.7mm x 71.5mm x 7.65mm
  • 174
Display
  • 6.1″ AMOLED
  • 1080 x 2340 pixels
  • variable refresh rate up to 120Hz
  • 6.1-inch OLED
  • 60Hz refresh rate
SoC
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (US, China, India and other regions)
  • Exynos 2200 (Europe, South America and other regions)
  • Apple A15 Bionic
RAM & Storage
  • 8GB RAM
  • 128GB/256GB
  • 4GB RAM
  • 128GB/256GB/512GB
Battery & Charging
  • 3,700mAh
  • 25W Wired fast charging (charger not included in box)
  • 15W wireless charging
  • Battery size not disclosed; Approximate size from regulatory filings: 3,227 mAh
  • Wired charging up to 20W
  • Wireless charging up to 7.5W
  • MagSafe charging up to 15W
Security Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanner Face ID
Rear Camera(s)
  • Primary: 50MP wide, f/1.8
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f.2.2
  • Tertiary: 10MP telephoto, 3x optical
  • Primary: 12MP wide, f/1.6 aperture, 1.6μm
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f/2.4 aperture
Front Camera(s) 10MP 12MP TrueDepth camera system
Port(s) USB-C Lightning
Audio Stereo speakers Stereo speakers
Connectivity
  • 5G (mmWave)
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.2
  • NFC
  • 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave)
  • Gigabit LTE with 4×4 MIMO and LAA
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • NFC
Software OneUI 4.3 over Android 12 iOS 15
Other Features Dual physical SIM Dual physical SIM or Dual eSIM

Samsung Galaxy S22 vs iPhone 13: Hardware and Design

Both the iPhone 13 and Galaxy S22 are glass-and-metal slab phones with premium construction, including toughened glass covering both the front and back sides and sturdy aluminum frames. Both are lightweight and easy to hold with one hand and will fit into just about any pocket.

Display

The screen sizes may be identical but the Galaxy S22 display is a tad better than the iPhone 13’s screen: the Galaxy S22 display has a double the refresh rate at 120Hz refresh rate, gets slightly brighter, and has a smaller cut-out — just a small hole punch, instead of the large notch eating into the iPhone 13’s screen.

However, iOS’ animations are just better optimized than Samsung’s OneUI, as the iPhone 13’s 60Hz somehow feels smoother than 60Hz, while Samsung’s 120Hz can see occasional stutter. The Galaxy S22’s animations are still ultimately more fluid moving with twice as many animations, but the gap is closer than the usual 120Hz vs 60Hz fare. The point is that enthusiasts may nitpick at the iPhone 13 display, but for most people, it remains absolutely fine.

iPhone 13 front s22

Both screens are flat too, giving the phone a similar in-hand feel, but the iPhone’s edges are a bit sharper, as Samsung has wisely added subtle chamfered edges where the display meets the aluminum frame.

Cameras

The iPhone 13 houses a dual-camera system covering the wide and ultra-wide focal range, while the Galaxy S22 one-ups Apple by using a triple-lens array that covers the wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto range. Because the iPhone 13 doesn’t have a dedicated zoom lens, any zoom beyond 3x starts to lose significant detail. Stick with 2x zoom, however, and it’s still serviceable.

iPhone 13

The Galaxy S22’s 3x telephoto zoom lens, on the other hand, is excellent, particularly for a phone at this price range. The other cameras aren’t shabby either, with a 50MP main camera and a 12MP ultra-wide. Samsung’s main camera has a larger image sensor and benefits from pixel-binning technology compared to the iPhone 13’s straightforward 12MP main camera, so low-light photos tend to benefit the Galaxy S22 too. But the iPhone 13 cameras are a bit more efficient on the software front — there’s almost no shutter delay (can’t say this about the Galaxy S22), and switching between the iPhone’s two lenses feels more seamless.

Photo of the Galaxy S22 on a table

Still, both of these phones’ main cameras are very good day and night thanks to computational photography smarts. For the ultra-wide sensor, it’s a virtual tie as both are solid performers given enough lighting. The iPhone 13 is a bit better performer in video, including the ability to shoot somewhat realistic bokeh video.

SoC and Memory

The iPhone 13 is powered by Apple’s A15 Bionic SoC, and while Apple doesn’t publicly reveal RAM information, teardowns have revealed that the phone runs on 4GB of RAM, with storage options at 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB. The Galaxy S22 uses 8GB of RAM and comes in either 128GB or 256GB storage options, but the silicon situation is a bit complicated. In countries like the US, China, India, and a few others, the Galaxy S22 runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, but in many other chunks of the world including Samsung’s home country of South Korea and virtually all of Europe, the phone runs on Samsung’s own Exynos 2200. Most reviewers have found in their testing that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is the more capable chip.

If we’re going by pure processing power, the iPhone 13 wins this one regardless, as Apple’s A15 Bionic beats the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in every benchmark test and some real-life tests too. But in real-world uses, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and even Exynos 2200 are more than powerful enough to satisfy most users.

Battery and other bits

Both phones’ batteries are a bit small, with Samsung’s device running on a 3,700mAh cell and the iPhone on a 3,227mAh battery. Because Apple’s iPhones have superior synergy between hardware and software (particularly the processor), the iPhone 13 has noticeably better battery life than the Galaxy S22 — it doesn’t help that Samsung’s screen is more power-hungry. The iPhone 13 is a phone that can last a full 12-hour day for most people, but the Galaxy S22 will almost certainly need a top-up in the evening if it were to go an entire day. Neither phone comes with charging bricks, but both support wireless charging and fast wired charging, albeit the definition of “fast” remains on the conservative end.

Elsewhere, both phones pack loud stereo speakers and IP68 water and dust resistance, but the iPhone 13’s haptics is noticeably superior to the Galaxy S22’s haptics.

Samsung Galaxy S22 and its retail box


Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: Software

Ah, the good old iOS vs Android debate. With both phones you’re getting the latest software that each platform has to offer — Android 12 for the Galaxy S22 and iOS 15 for the iPhone 13. But Samsung’s Android 12 has an extra layer of Samsung software on top that can bring good and bad (mostly good).

For example, Samsung’s OneUI brings useful multitasking abilities such as opening apps in resizable floating windows which is not even available in Google’s pure version of Android. OneUI also brings Samsung DeX, a useful sandbox UI that lets the Galaxy S22 output a Windows-like UI to an external display. But OneUI also brings redundant apps, such as Samsung having an internet browser along with Google’s own Chrome, or the many plugins a user is required to download just to pair a Samsung smartwatch.

One UI 4 screenshot One UI 4 screenshot iOS 15 home screen

iOS, on the other hand, is much more polished and seamless, and that’s due to Apple’s draconian grip over the operating system. This, too, can be both good and bad. On the plus side, iOS often runs more efficiently, with fewer instances of animation stutters or app crashes. Apple’s tight control over its App Store also means iPhone apps are generally more polished than Android apps, particularly when it comes to those from smaller companies. But Apple’s restrictions also means stubborn decision like not giving users the ability to run more than at a time, or the lack of a free homescreen grid.

I’m partial to Samsung’s software because I multitask often, but if you’re already familiar with iOS or used Apple’s eco-system in the past, the iPhone 13’s software will feel right at home.

Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: General Performance

As mentioned, the iPhone 13 runs on a more powerful chip, and this can be felt when doing intensive tasks like rendering 4k videos — it’s just noticeably faster on the iPhone 13 than Galaxy S22. But outside of specific niche power user tasks like this, the Galaxy S22 will perform perfectly fine. In fact, the Galaxy S22’s software can do more things — Samsung DeX really opens up possibilities — and thus make Samsung’s phone an arguably superior work machine. Being able to open two apps at once is a huge benefit that the iPhones still frustratingly do not offer. But as a gaming or media consumption device, the Galaxy S22 is a bit better too thanks to its screen being less blemished.

iPhone 13 playing video


Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: Which one is for you?

I personally think the Galaxy S22 is a better standalone device — better screen, better main camera, better productivity capabilities — but there’s no denying that the iPhone 13 Pro is surrounded by a better hardware and software ecosystem. The iOS 16 update that’s coming to the iPhone 13 this fall, for example, will bring some fun new tricks. It’s hard to see the Samsung Galaxy S22 gaining significant new features within months of Google announcing it at I/O.

The synergy between iPhone and Mac and iPad is also a bit better than the Galaxy S22’s connectivity with other Samsung products — although the South Korean tech giant is working hard on catching up. Ultimately, I think this showdown comes down to whether you prefer using Android or iOS, and both phones will serve you well if you either cannot or do not want to pay more than $699.

    Samsung Galaxy S22
    The entry level series in Samsung's 2022 flagship line, the S22 may not be ultra or even a plus, but it still brings a brilliant screen, top-end SoC, and strong camera performance across the board.
    Apple iPhone 13
    The Apple iPhone 13 offers the supremely powerful A15 Bionic silicon and a really good main camera in an affordable package.

The post Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13: Samsung and Apple battle it out in the entry level flagship space appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/OkpRHus
via IFTTT

Fossil brings its new Gen 6 Hybrid smartwatches to the Indian market

Fossil’s new Gen 6 Hybrid range of smartwatches is now available for purchase in various markets. Fossil unveiled the new range late last week and confirmed that it would be available in the US starting today. The company has now confirmed that the new Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid smartwatches will also be available in the Indian market starting today.

In case you missed our previous coverage, the new Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid range includes two designs — Machine and Stella. The Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid Machine comes in a single 45mm size variant with three color options — Black, Silver, and Smoke. The Gen 6 Hybrid Stella, on the other hand, features a smaller 40.5mm case and three different color variants, namely Rose Gold, Silver, and Two-tone. Both models come with a couple of band options, including a few silicone band styles, leather options, and even metal bracelets.

Fossil Gen 6 hybrid Stell with metal bracelet on white background. Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid Machine with metal bracelet on white background.

The Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid range offers support for a wide range of health and fitness tracking features, including SpO2 monitoring, heart rate tracking, workout tracking, sleep monitoring, and more. The watches also offer support for Amazon Alexa, smart notifications, and customizable watch faces.

Along with the new hybrid smartwatches, Fossil has also released a massive redesign for the Fossil Smartwatches companion app. The updated app brings more personalization features, at-a-glance metrics, and more. The update is already available for both Android and iOS users on the respective app stores.

Pricing & Availability

The Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid range will be available for purchase on Fossil’s website and offline retail stores starting today. In India, the watches will set you back ₹17,633 (~$225) for the leather and silicone strap variants and ₹19,173 (~$245) for the metal bracelet variants.

    Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid
    The new Fossil Gen 6 Hybrid range of smartwatches offer SpO2 tracking, improved heart rate monitoring, and Amazon Alexa support.

What do you think of Fossil’s new Gen 6 Hybrid smartwatches? Would you pick these over the Wear OS alternatives from Fossil or other OEMs? Let us know in the comments section below.

The post Fossil brings its new Gen 6 Hybrid smartwatches to the Indian market appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/NA10rcE
via IFTTT

Fast Pair on Wear OS will let you quickly pair your watch with your headphones

At I/O last year, Google revealed its plans to extend Fast Pair support to more device types, including speakers, Wear OS smartwatches, and cars from select manufacturers. The company followed up with an announcement earlier this year at CES to further bring Fast Pair support to even more products, like Android TVs, Chromebooks, and Matter-enabled smart home devices. Recently, the company shared another update about Fast Pair on Chromebooks, claiming that the feature would reach Chrome OS devices later this summer. Now, a new report reveals that Fast Pair support could soon make its way to Wear OS smartwatches as well.

Google recently updated the June 2022 Google Play System Updates changelog with the following entry under the “Device Connections” section (via 9to5Google):

[Wear OS] Fast Pair on Wear OS to allows previously paired headphones to be discovered and connected to wearables.

The fine print at the bottom of the page adds that the feature will become available through the Google Play services v22.24 update, which started rolling out to users last week. This means that users should be able to connect to previously paired headphones using a Wear OS smartwatch once the update becomes available widely. However, the update hasn’t rolled out to most users yet.

Google could be releasing the feature in preparation for the upcoming Pixel Watch, and it might not show up on other Wear OS smartwatches before Google’s own smartwatch hits the market. The Pixel Watch product page on the Google Store states that the watch will offer Fast Pair support to help users quickly “connect your earbuds, watch, and phone with each other.” However, it doesn’t reveal whether the feature will be available on other Wear OS smartwatches or not. The chances of Google limiting Fast Pair support to the Pixel Watch seem slim, as it will definitely be a useful addition for all Wear OS smartwatches.


Via: 9to5Google

The post Fast Pair on Wear OS will let you quickly pair your watch with your headphones appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/0KpCAWu
via IFTTT

dimanche 26 juin 2022

How to send a fax from Gmail: A step-by-step guide

A fax machine in 2022 sounds out of place. But in reality, a good chunk of people still use them to send faxes to one another. You’re likely to see a fax machine in old organizations such as government-established departments that are hellbent on sticking with their traditional ways of working. But the truth is, you don’t necessarily need an age-old fax machine to send a fax. Thanks to the power of the internet, you can now send a fax from Gmail and that’s exactly what we’re going to tell you. So, how do you send a fax from Gmail? Let’s find out!

How to send a fax from Gmail

The first thing you need to do is find a reliable fax service to use with Gmail. You can find one in the Google Workspace Marketplace. To do this, follow the steps given below:

  • Firstly, log in to your Gmail account on your preferred web browser and look for a “+” button on the right sidebar. You can see this button from anywhere within Gmail, I navigated to the ‘Scheduled’ email page just to avoid revealing the piles of emails in my Inbox.
    Gmail page to add add-ons
  • Clicking on the “+” button will open the Google Workspace Marketplace in a pop-up window. Use the search bar to find a suitable fax service to use with Gmail.
    Google Workspace Marketplace in Gmail
  • We’ll use the ‘FAX.PLUS’ add-on for this tutorial as it appears to be among the most popular ones for this task.
  • Click on the Install button from the main listing page and grant the necessary permission for it to work. Once installed, you should see it in the sidebar alongside the previously installed add-ons.
    FAX.PLUS installed in Gmail sidebar

Now, let’s see how you can use the add-ons to send a fax in Gmail:

  • Now, simply click on the FAX.PLUS add-on icon to open a small window on the sidebar. Here, you’ll see an empty field in which you can type the recipient’s fax number. It starts with a + followed by the international dialing code, followed by the fax number that you’re trying to reach. Fill this space with the correct fax number without any spaces in between and click on New Fax.
    Sending a fax from Gmail
  • Clicking on New Fax will open the familiar email window with the fax number added as an email address. Here, you can also add other email IDs to the CC and BCC fields if you wish to send the document to someone via regular email.
    Enter fax number to see email pop up in Gmail
  • The message body of the email acts as your cover sheet whereas any documents you wish to send your recipient as fax should be added as an attachment.
  • Once you’ve added everything you need, simply click on send as you would for a regular email and it’ll be sent as a fax.

Well, that’s how you send a fax from Gmail in 2022. Upon successful delivery, you’ll get a confirmation email notifying you about the same. It may take up to 5 minutes, so wait for the confirmation email before sending another one.


FAX.PLUS and its alternatives

FAX.PLUS is one of the most popular fax services used with Gmail to send a fax. One of the best things about this particular service is that it allows you to send a maximum of ten pages for free. You’ll have to pay once you exhaust your limit but the pricing is very reasonable, starting at $4.99 for the basic plan that lets you send up to 100 pages per month. You will, however, need at least a basic plan to be able to receive a fax. You can also choose to splurge on the most expensive tier and get additional features such as Slack and Zapier integration too.

FAX.PLUS pricing

While FAX.PLUS is a fairly popular online fax service, it’s not the only one that you can use with Gmail. There are a bunch of other options to consider like MyFax, eFax, FaxZero, and more. We suggest you take a look at some of the popular ones on the market and compare the pricing to find the one that suits your need. But if you don’t see yourself sending a lot of fax on a regular basis, then we think FAX.PLUS itself is a great option. You won’t have to spend anything as long as you keep things under ten pages.


Now that you know how easy it is to send a fax from Gmail, which online fax service are you going to use? Let us know by dropping a line in the comments below.

The post How to send a fax from Gmail: A step-by-step guide appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/AojPe3Z
via IFTTT