LightBlog

dimanche 15 mai 2022

Sony Xperia 1 IV Review: A different approach to mobile photography

Sony’s smartphones have always differed from other handsets on the market, in that they never seemed to care about industry trends. This could be something as superficial as bezel sizes — Sony has never bothered to chase the all-screen look the way other Android brands have — to something as crucial as digital imaging philosophies. While every other phone brand has been touting their computational photography prowess — the idea that their phones’ AI is so smart at analyzing scenes it can practically take the photo for you — Sony’s doubled down on giving users more manual controls over its smartphone camera. In fact, Sony invited the engineers of its popular Alpha camera line to develop the camera system of last year’s Xperia 1 III (pronounced Xperia One mark three), which became a cult hit among camera enthusiasts.

Now comes the Xperia 1 IV (mark four), an iterative update on the mark three that continues the manual camera approach with more “real camera” features like real-time eye autofocus (a Sony camera specialty), burst shooting mode that can snap up to 20 shots in a second, and the ability to shoot 4K/120fps videos on every rear-facing lens. But perhaps more importantly, Sony also polished other things to make the Xperia 1 IV less of a hardcore niche device. This includes a smarter, easier-to-use basic camera mode for those who do want to just point and shoot, and a significantly larger battery to power that gorgeous (and overkill) 4k/120Hz OLED display.

Make no mistake, the Xperia 1 IV is still a very niche phone mostly catering to fans of Sony’s Alpha cameras. But at least it’s now quite usable for an average joe too.

Sony Xperia One Mark 4

    Sony Xperia 1 IV
      Sony's new Xperia 1 IV is an iterative update on last year's cult-favorite Xperia 1 III, so you get the same 4K, 120Hz OLED screen along with a triple-lens camera system that strives to offer more manual controls. There are improvements here obviously: including an improved zoom lens.

        Pros:

        Cons:

    Sony Xperia 1 IV Specifications

    Specs Sony Xperia 1 IV
    Build
    • Colors: black, turquoise, purple
    • Protection: Corning Gorilla Victus (front and back), IP68 rating for water and dust resistance
    Dimensions & Weight 165mm x 71mm x 8.2mm, 191g
    Display
    • Main
      • 6.5-inch 4K OLED HDR (3840 x 1644)
      • 120Hz refresh rate
      • 240Hz touch sampling rate
      • 100% DCI-P3
      • HDR BT.2020 (Rec.2020)
      • D65 White point
      • 21:9 aspect ratio
    SoC
    • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
    RAM & Storage
    • 12GB RAM
    • 256GB/512GB storage
    • MicroSD card support
    Battery & Charging
    • 5,000mAh
    • 30W fast wired charging
    • Wireless charging support
    Security
    • Side-mounted fingerprint scanner
    Rear Cameras
    • Primary: 12MP, f/1.7, 24mm, 1/1.7″, 1.8µm, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF
    • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f/2.2, 16mm, 1/2.6″, Dual Pixel PDAF
    • Tertiary: 12MP variable periscope, f/2.3-2.8, 85mm-125mm, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF
    • Quaternary: 3D iToF sensor
    • Features:
      • ZEISS optics
      • 20fps AF/AE tracking burst with noise reduction
      • 60fps continuous AF/AE calculations
      • Real-time Eye AF
      • AI super-resolution zoom
      • Optical SteadyShot with FlawlessEye
      • Cinema Pro 4K 120fps recording with up to 5x slow motion
    Front Camera 12MP
    Port
    • USB Type-C
    • 3.5mm headphone jack
    Audio & Vibration
    • Full range front-firing stereo speakers
    • Dolby Atmos
    • Hi-Res Audio
    • 360 Reality Audio (through speakers)
    • 360 Spatial Sound (over headphones)
    Connectivity
    • 5G (Sub-6Hz)
    • Bluetooth 5.x
    • 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac dual-band WiFi
    • NFC
    • GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
    Software Android 12

    About this review: This review was written after two weeks of testing a Sony Xperia 1 IV provided by Sony Hong Kong. Sony did not have any input in this review.


    Sony Xperia 1 IV: Hardware and Design

    The new Xperia 1 IV looks just about identical to the Xperia 1 III, with the only differences being the removal of a physical button that was used to launch the Google Assistant last year, and the relocation of the SIM tray to the bottom of the new model. This means the new phone is still a rectangular glass-and-metal slab that’s a bit blocky and elongated than most phones on the market. Sony’s decision to use a 21:9 aspect ratio is meant to cater to fans of cinematic videos — when held sideways, the screen is perfect for widescreen content — but it also makes the phone easier to hold because it’s not as wide from left to right.

    Xperia 1 IV's back

     

    That 6.5-inch, 4K 120Hz OLED screen introduced in last year’s Xperia 1 III returns, but it’s noticeably brighter. Sony did not reveal numbers, but it’s a big improvement over last year’s somewhat mediocre brightness level. And while it still doesn’t come close to Galaxy S22 Ultra levels bright, it’s now more than usable even outside on sunny days. It’s certainly better than the Pixel 6 Pro’s screen brightness.

    Xperia 1 IV's tall screen

    I have gone on record before saying 4K resolution on a smartphone display is pointless, and I stand by this. Sure, this screen is razor-sharp, but so are the 1440p screens in a half dozen other flagships that I’ve tested in the past few months. The wild thing is, Sony doesn’t give you the option to manually lower resolution, and the refresh rate is either 120Hz or 60Hz. So yes, this screen is a battery hog.

    Sony answered the battery issue this year with a 5,000mAh battery, and while it improves battery life over last year’s 4,500mAh cell, it’s still not quite enough. It can be an all-day phone if you have a light day, but on heavy days you will need to top up before your night ends — more on this in the performance section later.

    The screen is sandwiched by noticeable bezels, and I don’t mind them too much — they’re symmetrical and they house very good front-facing stereo speakers. Yes, this phone is a very good on-the-go NetFlix machine thanks to its relatively light 191g, widescreen that eliminates letterboxing for many movies, and front-facing speakers. There’s also a headphone jack if you want to plug in high-end headphones.

    The Xperia 1 IV (left) with the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the iPhone 13 Pro Max xperia 1 iv

    On the right side of the device sits the power button that doubles as a fingerprint scanner, volume rocker, and a textured physical button that is meant to be used as a camera shutter in not one, but two camera apps that come with the phone. The button has some travel, allowing it to begin autofocus when pressed halfway (just like in Sony cameras). A full press, of course, snaps the photo.

    xperia 1 iv xperia 1 iv

    The phone is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 as expected, with 12GB of RAM and 256GB or 512GB of storage. There’s also wireless charging and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance.

    xperia 1 iv xperia 1 iv

    Sony Xperia 1 IV: Cameras

    The Sony Xperia 1 IV features a triple 12MP camera system covering the wide (24mm), ultra-wide (16mm), and a variable portrait zoom lens that can vary its optical zoom length between 85mm (or around 3.5x) to 125mm (5.2x). This latter lens is unique, as it’s a periscope zoom lens with a physical moving lens inside that, as far as I know, only Sony is doing. Last year’s Xperia 1 III used a similar technology already, but that lens could only jump between two set optical zoom ranges. This year, the range is fluid, meaning the zoom lens is producing optical zoom anywhere between the 3.5x to 5.2x distance. There’s also a TOF sensor which helps with additional depth mapping.

    Xperia 1 IV camera system

    If you’re new to Sony’s smartphone cameras, you need to know that Sony approaches mobile photography differently from other brands. Essentially, Sony wants you to take photos the way you would with a real camera. For example, most photographers know that you should avoid shooting against a backlight (directly against the sun or facing a window that’s letting in a lot of light) because it will result in an unbalanced shot with overly strong contrast. Real cameras will either properly expose the light source and leave the rest of the frame drenched in shadows, or try to expose the darkened area; though, as a result, completely blow out the light source.

    Recent smartphone cameras, using computational photography tricks like multi-stack HDR, have managed to throw that conventional wisdom out the window. You can point your iPhone or Pixel directly against the backlight and shoot, and the phones should produce a shot that’s evenly illuminated (or at least supposed to, because from my testing, the iPhone 13 Pro/Pro Max actually fails at this sometimes). This is great for most people, who no longer have to worry about lighting when shooting, but sometimes a phone whose HDR is too crazy good (like the Vivo X70 Pro Plus) will produce shots that look a bit unrealistic, almost like there’s been editing work done — because there was, by the phone’s ISP.

    In the below photos, shot against the harshest light source in the world, Sony’s shots blow out the sky and leave anything ground level covered in shadows, leaving some parts in darkness. The iPhone 13 Pro and Vivo X70 Pro Plus, by comparison, produced a shot that better exposes everything. I think most people would agree the Apple and Vivo shots are “better”, but those Apple and Vivo shots are also unrealistic. Sony’s shots are closer to how the scene looked to my eyes.

    sony camera sample

    Here’s the thing: if a real photographer holding a real camera has decided to snap this photo, they have made a conscious decision to shoot a very contrasty shot with extreme shadows and highlights. In a way, Apple and Vivo manufacturing a bluer sky and brightening up shadows go against what would have been a photographer’s intent. That’s Sony’s idea with its mobile cameras: don’t just mindlessly point and shoot; instead, have intention with your shots.

    Sony approaches mobile photography differently from other brands. Essentially, Sony wants you to take photos the way you would with a real camera

    In less harsh conditions, the Xperia 1 IV photos will still leave more shadows in the shot, still won’t artificially brighten up scenes like every other smartphone, and usually, it works quite well. In the below set, we can see part of Sony’s shot is noticeably darker than the other two shots. The iPhone 13 Pro’s shot is very bright and exhibits major digital sharpening — look at the hard, deep lines on the Buddha statue compared to the other two shots. Personally, I think Apple’s shot looks terribly unnatural. Vivo’s shot, unsurprisingly to me, is perhaps the most balanced and aesthetically pleasing of the three — it’s illuminated a bit more than the scene at the time, and there’s an extra punch to the green leaves. But it’s also not as natural. Sony’s shot is the most accurate depiction of the scene at the time to my eyes, and the contrast of the left frame covered in shadows better conveyed the mood of the scene at the time.

    sony camera sample iPhone 13 Pro, main camera Vivo X70 Pro Plus, main camera

    All the above Sony shots were captured in manual mode. If I switched to auto mode and let Sony’s brains help me fix lighting and exposure, the results are quite good. This is a change from previous Xperia phones, whose auto modes were simply not up to par. Below are more shots captured in auto mode by the Xperia 1 IV’s main camera.

    Xperia 1 IV, main camera sony camera sample

    As mentioned at the beginning of the review, the Xperia 1 IV has three camera features that Sony is very proud of:

    • Automatic eye autofocus, meaning the phone will detect most mammals’ eyes and lock onto one of them for focus in photos and videos
    • Burst shooting mode for snapping up to 20 shots in one second
    • 4K 120fps video recording, which is used mostly for slow-motion videos

    All these features are supported on every lens in the rear-facing main system. They all work as advertised. Eye autofocus kicks in automatically whether I’m using the wide or telephoto lenses, and it works on humans, cats, and dogs from my testing.

    Burst shooting mode is great for those who want to shoot fast-moving scenes like sports or moving animals. In the below screenshots, you can see I was able to capture burst photos of a cat in the middle of a stretch, or a man shooting a basketball. If I cycle through the photos in rapid succession, they look like animations.

    The ability to snap rapid-fire burst shots with zoom lenses has allowed me to grab some great shots that a slower phone may not have been able to get. The below zoom shots were captured while I was in a moving bus on a highway.

    sony xperia 1 iv camera samples sony xperia 1 iv camera samples

    While Sony is keen to market its variable optical zoom lens, the reality is the quality is pretty good but not great — definitely not Galaxy S22 Ultra level. But still, it’s a better zoom lens than a phone without a Periscope lens, like an iPhone 13 Pro.

    Xperia 1 IV zoom shots Xperia 1 IV zoom shots Xperia 1 IV zoom shots

    The ultra-wide camera is fine in good lighting conditions but at night produces images that are a bit soft on details.

    sony xperia 1 iv camera samples sony camera sample

    The Xperia 1 IV’s camera app can be used in automatic point-and-shoot mode, but most enthusiasts will want to switch over to manual mode, which offers granular control with a UI similar to Sony’s Alpha cameras. Here, you can tweak ISO, shutter speed, and white balance, as well as use a histogram to gauge exposure levels.

    With a few tweaks, you can produce drastically different shots of the same scene.

    Xperia 1 IV, main camera, manual mode Xperia 1 IV, main camera, manual mode

    That same total control over the camera carries over to videography too — I can pull off cinematic tricks like “rack focus” using the manual focus dial, zooming in and out is smoother than in most Android phones, but most importantly, 4K 120fps slow-motion videos look great.

    Overall, I really enjoyed using the Sony Xperia 1 IV’s camera system. I am no professional photographer, but I do own two Sony Alpha cameras for work purposes, so I’d say I produce photos and videos at a semi-pro level. I respect the Xperia 1 IV for not going the same route as all the other phone brands and trying to stick to the basic principles of photography. Having a physical shutter button and a camera UI that offers more controls makes me want to snap photos even more than I already do.

    Having a physical shutter button and a camera UI that offers more controls makes me want to snap photos even more than I already do

    I find myself constantly walking around the city holding the phone sideways, with a finger on the shutter button, ready to burst fire at any interesting thing I may encounter. Now, are the photos the best-looking photos? Not necessarily, but they at least have a distinct vibe to them, instead of looking like the overly punchy, perfect HDR Google Pixel look.

    A dedicated shutter button adds to the photography experience A dedicated shutter button adds to the photography experience

     


    Sony Xperia 1 IV: Software

    The Xperia 1 IV runs Android 12 with Sony’s very light Android skin on top. The phone UI basically behaves like stock Android with a notification panel that looks very similar to the Pixel 6 Pro’s. The most notable addition is “Side Sense,” a sidebar located at the edge of the screen that can be triggered by double taps or swipes. Depending on the trigger action, it will launch a floating menu hosting often used apps, or launch app pairs in split-screen mode. Thanks to the 21:9 aspect ratio, two apps can open in a split-screen mode in symmetrical squares. Many apps, including key ones I use daily like WhatsApp and Slack, can also open in floating window mode.

    Animations are fluid, and the shutter button can be assigned to quick launch an app when long-pressed at the homescreen. For the most part, I have no gripes with this software. If I must nitpick: the floating window options have slight stutters when being moved around the screen, it’s not as fluid as Samsung’s or OPPO’s implementation.


    Sony Xperia 1 IV: General performance and battery life

    xperia 1 IV xperia 1 IV

    With a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, the phone performs at a flagship level for most tasks. However, the phone is more susceptible to overheating than other phones, likely due to the combination of the 4k screen and robust camera hardware. I actually don’t notice the thermal issue when using the phone normally or even gaming. Instead, it’s when I’m recording videos. On occasions during hot days, I’ll get a pop-up notification warning me the phone is overheating. Still, despite the pop-up message, I was still able to film with the phone without issues for another few minutes before the phone kicks me out of the video app.

    xperia 1 iv

    The Xperia 1 IV displaying an overheating warning.

    The Xperia 1 IV is a great Netflix watching machine thanks to its front-facing speakers and widscreen aspect ratio

    As mentioned, the Xperia 1 IV is a very good Netflix watching machine because of its front-facing speakers and the wider screen eliminating most letterboxing from movies. Battery life, also as mentioned, is just okay. On a very heavy use day, like last Saturday when I took the phone out for a filming session, the battery drained from 100% to 20% in six hours. On a moderate use day, like the next day when I also took the phone out all Sunday but didn’t shoot as many photos and videos, then the Xperia 1 IV lasted me a solid 10 hours before the battery dipped below 10%. On light usage days, like a weekday when I’m mostly tied to a desk on the computer, then the Xperia 1 IV can make it to the end of a 12, 13-hour day with over a quarter of battery left. Basically, if you take the phone out on weekends, be prepared to charge it before your evening ends.


    Should you buy the Sony Xperia 1 IV?

    In a sea of similar-looking and feeling smartphones, I have a natural respect and fondness for Sony for thinking outside the box, for sticking to its guns, for zigging where others zag. To be honest, I still think something like the Google Pixel 6 Pro or the Vivo X70 Pro Plus can grab a better shot most of the time, but I like that the Xperia 1 IV challenges me to make the adjustments needed to find better exposure in a shot. But in between the still sub-par battery life (caused by the unnecessary 4K display), thermal issues, and a very high $1600 retail price, the Xperia 1 IV is hard to recommend to anyone but enthusiasts.

    The price has rightfully garnered some scoff from those who follow smartphone news, but honestly, people into cameras won’t be deterred by the price, because camera gear is expensive.  My 20mm lens for my Sony camera alone is $1,200. A brand name Manfrotto tripod can easily go for $800. A camera bag, $300. To that group, $1600 for a phone isn’t high. But that group is a niche, and the Xperia 1 IV is a niche phone.

    You should buy the Xperia 1 IV if:

    • You want a different, more manual, smartphone camera system
    • You take a lot of action photos and could use a burst shooting mode
    • You want a phone that’s different from the pack
    • You want a headphone jack and front facing speakers from a top tier flagship that isn’t styled as a gaming smartphone

    You should not buy the Xperia 1 IV if:

    • You want top-notch computational photography with things like dynamic HDR and really good night modes
    • You want/need all-day battery life
    • You care about getting a good “conventional” value on your smartphone purchase
      Sony Xperia 1 IV
      The Sony Xperia 1 IV brings a 4k, 120Hz OLED screen, a triple lens system with Sony's trademark eye autofocus and burst shooting mode, as well as ability to shoot 4K 120fps video.

    The post Sony Xperia 1 IV Review: A different approach to mobile photography appeared first on XDA.



    from XDA https://ift.tt/i3WzQft
    via IFTTT

    samedi 14 mai 2022

    Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) Review: Once you fast-charge, you can never go back

    When you talk about fast charging on a smartphone, a good chunk of the world still experiences it at a maximum of 18W-25W, thanks to Apple, Samsung, and the budget market sticking to these numbers. Move over to Asia though, and you’d find that even 25W barely qualifies as what one can consider fast charging. We’ve long moved on to 33W, 45W, 65W, and even 80W and 120W charging solutions on consumer-ready smartphones. At MWC 2022, OPPO showed off its 150W fast charging solution, and now, both Realme and OnePlus are out with their takes on 150W smartphones with the Realme GT Neo 3 and the OnePlus 10R respectively. In this article, we’ll take a look at the Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) and see what the hype behind super-fast charging is — and whether you should care enough to base your next smartphone purchase decision on the basis of it.

      Realme GT Neo 3
      The Realme GT Neo 3 comes in 150W and 80W charging flavors, promising some of the fastest charging on the market.

        Features:

        Pros:

        Cons:


    Realme GT Neo 3: Specifications

    Specification Realme GT Neo 3
    Dimensions & Weight
    • 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2mm
    • 188g
    Display
    • 6.7-inch FHD+ AMOLED
    • 120Hz refresh rate
    • 100% DCI-P3 coverage
    • Corning Gorilla Glass 5
    SoC
    • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 5G
      • Mali-G610 MC6 GPU
    RAM & Storage
    • 6GB/8GB/12GB LPDDR5 RAM
    • 128GB/256GB UFS 3.1 storage
    Battery & Charging
    • 4,500mAh with 150W fast charging support, or
    • 5,000mAh with 80W fast charging support
    Security In-display fingerprint scanner
    Rear Camera(s)
    • Primary: 50MP Sony IMX766, f/1.88, OIS
    • Ultra-wide: 8MP, f/2.25, 119.7° FOV
    • Macro: 2MP, f/2.4
    Front Camera(s) 16MP, f/2.45
    Port(s) USB Type-C
    Audio
    • Dual speakers
    • Dolby Atmos certification
    • Hi-Res Audio certification
    Connectivity
    • Dual SIM 5G+5G
    • 4G LTE
    • 360° NFC
    • Wi-Fi
    • Bluetooth
    • GPS/AGPS, Beidou, Glonass, QZSS, Galileo
    Software Realme UI 3.0 based on Android 12
    Colors
    • Asphalt Black
    • Sprint White
    • Nitro Blue

    About this review: Realme India sent us the Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) for review. Realme did not have any input in this article.


    Realme GT Neo 3: Design and Display

    Realme makes bold color, material, and finish (CMF) choices on its smartphones, and the Realme GT Neo 3 continues on that path. We have the Sprint White color variant for review, and it’s relatively muted with a cooler white color when compared to the Nitro Blue which is loud with its blue color. Both of these colors have a contrasting color stripe running offset on the back. The stripe skips the camera module and the big “realme” logo on the back, and it gives the phone a nice identity. The back is made of glass with a matte texture over it except for the camera module, which has a shiny finish. The end result is that there are no fingerprint smudges on the device, so you aren’t constantly worried about the back looking dirty.

    If you’d prefer an even more muted look, Realme has a pretty simple Black color variant that skips out on the stripe for a more generic smartphone look. While I like the stripe design overall, I would have preferred a smaller branding on the back of the device.

    Realme makes bold CMF choices on its smartphones, and the Realme GT Neo 3 continues on that path

    Curiously, the Realme GT Neo 3 has a polycarbonate mid-frame. While polycarbonate mid-frames have their place in the smartphone market, it does feel out of place on a device targeting the price range that the Realme GT Neo 3 does. I would have preferred a more premium-feeling glass-metal sandwich at this price. There’s also no IP rating on the device, so it’s probably best to keep it away from dust and rain. Two very surprising shortcomings indeed.

    Beyond this, there’s nothing inherently wrong with the Realme GT Neo 3’s design, and most users will like what they’re holding in their hands. The fingerprint sensor is located pretty close to the bottom of the display as we’ve seen in many other recent smartphones, but you get used to the positioning after a bit. The volume rocker is present on the left side and the ridged “side button” on the right side. Realme is following the recent trend where the power button is being referred to as the side button, and a default press and hold triggers Google Assistant instead of the power menu — you can change this in the Settings though.

    On the front of the Realme GT Neo 3 is a 6.7-inch 120Hz FHD+ AMOLED display with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for protection. This is a good display that supports HDR10+ and up to 1000 nits of peak brightness. It’s also a flat display with no curved edges, and I count that as a plus for practicality. However, note that this is not an LTPO display, so while you can choose between 60Hz and 120Hz for your refresh rate, it’s not going to drop really low to conserve power when other phones (such as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra) may have been able to.

    Realme also mentions that the phone has a dedicated display processor, but it only kicks in for frame interpolation when gaming, so you’re not going to be seeing its advantages beyond that use case, if at all. During my time with the phone, I had no complaints regarding the display, and it served my needs for social media and content consumption pretty well.


    Realme GT Neo 3: Battery and Charging

    We’ll talk about performance in a bit, but before that, it makes sense to approach the main highlight of this device: its fast charging experience. The Realme GT Neo 3 comes in two variants with different battery and charging speed combinations:

    • 4,500 mAh battery with 150W fast charging; 160W charger in the box.
    • 5,000 mAh battery with 80W fast charging; 80W charger in the box.

    The 150W fast charging option only comes in the highest RAM and storage SKU, so you’ll need to get the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage option to also get the 150W fast charging variant with the 160W charging brick (no, that’s not a typo).

    Getting to the meat of the discussion, Realme makes some lofty claims about the 150W version. The company claims that the phone is capable of reaching from 0% to 50% in about 5 minutes, and from 0% to 100% of the 4,500 mAh battery in just 17 minutes with the Rapid Charging setting turned on. How true are these claims? Not absolutely, but you’re still bound to remain impressed with the actual charging performance. From our testing with the Rapid Charging setting on, the phone reaches 50% charge in under 10 minutes, and a full charge in under 20 minutes. We’re off of both claims by a few minutes, but India’s ambient temperature during these tests was a toasty 34° C — you should be able to shave some more seconds off if you have cooler ambient temperatures.

    Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) - Charging Speed Graph

    The phone does heat up when you use the Rapid Charging setting. The hottest temperature I observed was 42° C (when the ambient room temperature was 34° C), and this was on the right side of the back at the same level as the bottom edge of the camera module. The coolest point on the back of the device was 35.4° C in the same run, which sounds about right considering the ambient temperature. 42° C is what I would consider noticeably hot to the touch — it will cause you some discomfort if you keep holding it for more than a minute. Realme says the phone has a large vapor chamber setup that is designed to dissipate heat, with the idea being that it’s better to have the heat generated moved out as quickly as possible, instead of letting it stay trapped. However, I can’t be the only person finding these temperatures uncomfortable and rather impractical.

    Temperature of the Realme GT Neo 3 in White color, when charging at 150W in Rapid Charging Mode

    The Rapid Charging setting will get you the fastest results at the cost of a toasty phone

    With the Rapid Charging setting off, temperatures remain better in check. With an ambient room temperature of 34° C, the same maximum and minimum temperature points on the phone were 39.6° C and 33.2° C. The heat zone was also smaller, so you’ll experience less heat overall. Charging times take a “hit” — they still remain impressive for a piece of tech you carry in your pocket, but the numbers are obviously lower than the Rapid Charging mode. You get a full charge in about 28 minutes, and a 50% charge in under 11 minutes, both of which I would still consider very practical numbers. In light of the heat situation, I would strongly recommend keeping the Rapid Charging setting off — you won’t notice the extra time taken for a full charge, but you will notice the difference in temperature.

    We don’t have access to the 80W version of the Realme GT Neo 3, nor of the OnePlus 10R, but we do have access to the OnePlus 10 Pro in its 80W, 5,000 mAh battery form factor. As we noted in our OnePlus 10 Pro review, we could get a full charge in 33 minutes with 80W SuperVOOC. Both Realme and OnePlus share the underlying technology of OPPO’s SuperVOOC, so we can take the findings from the OnePlus 10 Pro as a rough estimate of the same charging technology performance on the 80W versions of the Realme GT Neo 3 and the OnePlus 10R. With either 150W or 80W numbers (or even 65W charging for that matter), I can confidently assert that anyone who gets used to this fast charging will find it jarring to go back to a slower charging device, and they’d specifically feel the limitation if the device was a flagship that cost 2x-3x of this phone. You know what I’m talking about.

    With great power comes great responsibility. So, Realme’s parent company OPPO emphasizes the safety of its 150W fast charging tech, and Realme reiterates all of the same. There is a Battery Health Engine at play that claims to help your phone retain up to 80% of its charging capacity up until the 1600 charging cycle mark versus the conventional 800 charging cycles. There is no way for us to verify these claims, so we’ll leave you to be the judge of them. Note that you don’t get the Battery Health Engine feature in the standard 80W charging variant.

    Realme GT Neo 3 with its 160W charger and its cable

    An additional point goes to the Realme GT Neo 3 in that Realme packs the charger in the box for both variants. The 80W variant gets a USB Type-A charger and a USB Type-A to Type-C cable. The 150W version gets a 160W charging brick with a Type-C port and a C to C cable. Both the charging brick and the cable are thick. The brick supports a higher wattage than what the phone does, but it only supports up to 45W USB Power Delivery. In essence, while you can use it to charge your other devices like your laptop, laptops that need more power than 45W will not benefit from this brick. It’s a bit curious to see OPPO/Realme pack an extra 10W of room on the charger even when the device can’t make use of it: maybe something else is coming in the future?

    The counterpoint to a super-fast charging setup is that your battery shrinks to accommodate the circuitry needed to enable such super fast charging. This means that you will just about last through a day with the 4,500 mAh battery on the Realme GT Neo 3. This is again pretty good, but nothing that will blow you away. The 80W version of the device with a 5,000 mAh battery would get you there with a lot more headroom to spare.

    Given the situation outlined above with regard to charging speeds, the resultant temperatures, and the battery life, I would personally choose the 80W version of the device with its 5,000 mAh battery over the 150W version of the device with its 4,500 mAh battery.


    Realme GT Neo 3: Camera

    The camera on the Realme GT Neo 3 isn’t its best talking point, but it gets the job done. The rear camera setup comprises the 50MP Sony IMX766 sensor with OIS, an 8MP ultrawide angle camera, and a 2MP macro camera that can focus up to 4cm close. I’m not going to be spending too much time on this aspect of the device, because we’ve seen the primary sensor on a wide range of devices so far: ranging from the Realme 9 Pro Plus, Realme GT 2, Realme GT 2 Pro, OnePlus Nord 2, OnePlus 9RT, and of course the OnePlus 10R, and more. The key takeaway with the primary camera remains the same as you see on devices like the Realme 9 Pro Plus and Realme GT 2 Pro: you will get some excellent photos during the day, and fairly decent photos during the night.

    What isn’t that great are the non-primary cameras. The quality falls off with the ultrawide camera, and the macro camera is just okay too. There is no optical zoom on the device, but the camera app offers you digital zoom, which you should avoid. Selfie duties are handled by a 16MP camera, and it will serve your social media needs just fine.

    Realme GT Neo 3: Camera Samples

    Overall, this isn’t a phone you buy for the camera in particular, and that’s fine since Realme has many other camera-focused devices that you could purchase instead. Even still, if you did get this phone and used the camera, the main shooter will keep you happy while the others will just about let you coast by.


    Realme GT Neo 3: Software and Performance

    The Realme GT Neo 3 comes with the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 5G SoC, which sits around the same levels as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G SoC. The Dimensity 8100 has 4x ARM Cortex-A78 cores @2.85GHz plus 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores @2GHz. GPU duties are handled by the Mali-G610 MC6.

    In day-to-day usage, the Realme GT Neo 3 does not break a sweat. I’ve been a firm believer in flagship MediaTek SoCs as an alternative to Snapdragon flagship SoCs, and the Dimensity 8100 works great in that regard, giving you performance that will not have you question the SoC in the device. Zipping around the UI in Realme UI (based on ColorOS) is fluid, and there’s nothing out of the ordinary to notice in general performance. There’s a small bit of thermal throttling that happens during intensive tasks at about the 4-5 minute mark, but the minor drop is only noticeable in benchmarking apps and not in daily usage, apps, and games alike.

    I played a few hours of Genshin Impact too, and I have nothing to complain about on that end either. This phone should work out if you’re into casual gaming, but I would avoid it for more hardcore gaming scenarios where you would need to charge the phone while gaming for longer hours. The quick battery top-ups generate a lot of heat, and if the phone is fairly hot itself from a gaming session, it won’t charge as quickly — thereby leaving behind its selling point.

    A major point of contention is the bloatware situation on the Realme GT Neo 3. The phone runs on Realme UI 3.0, which in itself is based on ColorOS 12 based on Android 12. While I have seen this UX on several phones by now, this is the most bloated experience so far. There are a ton of pre-installed applications on the device, including Realme’s own apps and third-party apps:

    • Third-Party Apps:
      • Amazon
      • Byjus
      • Dailyhunt
      • HeyFun
      • Josh
      • LinkedIn
      • Moj
      • MX TakaTak
      • PhonePe
      • ShareChat
      • Snapchat
    • Realme Apps:
      • Clone Phone
      • Realme Community
      • DocVault
      • Finshell Pay
      • Hot Apps
      • ORoaming
      • Realme Link
      • Realme Store
      • Soloop Cut
      • Theme Store

    The bloatware situation on the Realme GT Neo 3 is abysmal

    Such preinstalled apps help subsidize the cost of the device to the end-users. Admittedly, while the third-party apps are easy to uninstall, they will make a return with every OTA update. If these apps are something you use anyway, you won’t be bothered, but there are just way too many of them on here, and I sorely wished Realme would trim it down.

    Keep in mind that Google apps are also present on this device, so you can see how populated the phone feels right after the first boot and setup (screenshots above) before you even restore your data from your older device. Add your own apps to the mix, and you just end up with a ton of apps, making it difficult to locate apps that you actually need to use. I did end up deleting all of the pre-installed third-party apps, so I didn’t face any notification spam issues, but the ingredients are present for it to become a problem. I’d much rather we never reach that stage.

    Beyond bloatware, Realme UI is great to use. There are a ton of features on the device, including the ability to clone apps to run a simultaneous second account, app vaults, a theme store, and more. A lot of average users appreciate these features, and they will not be disappointed. For downsides, Realme only promises two Android version updates, and Realme devices generally do not support bootloader unlocking.


    Realme GT Neo 3: Conclusion

    The Realme GT Neo 3 is a good device, and the headlining 150W charging feature is indeed insane. However, it’s clear that the device is making some compromises to achieve that one thing it absolutely excels at. The question then remains if those compromises work for your use cases.

    The Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) excels at charging, but this excellence occurs within the narrow confines of ideal conditions. In real life — and with India’s ambient temperatures — you’re unlikely to keep using the Rapid Charging feature every day, and you’d end up with charging times that are closer to the 80W numbers. In such a situation, you’d be better off trading the 150W charging for the 80W charging, simply because you get a bigger battery that lasts more confidently through the day. One thing is for sure, whether it be 80W or 150W, once you go fast charging, you can never go back to using smartphones with 18W-25W charging (like the iPhones and the Samsungs of the world) and not feel chained to the wall.

    For other pros with the Realme GT Neo 3, the display is excellent, and the lighter weight means it’s comfortable to hold for a longer period of time. The primary camera also works well. Realme also has a few good bank offers, which can help bring the price of the device down — but count this as a positive only if they are available at the time of your purchase and you can take advantage of it.

    Beyond that, there are things you may not like about the phone. The camera setup may feel rather limiting, considering how much you’re paying. The bloat situation is also rather worrisome since this isn’t exactly an early-budget smartphone: why so many preloaded apps, Realme? Realme has also made devices that come off more premium in the hand — this device has a bit more of a subdued characteristic to it, and that may be a good or bad thing subjectively.

    You should buy the Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) if:

    • You want very fast charging. Like, really fast.
    • You want a smartphone that works great for daily usage.

    You should not buy the Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) if:

    • You want more versatility in the camera setup.
    • You want a clean, bloatware-free smartphone.
    • You want a device that feels more premium in the hand.
    • You care about smartphone heat.
      Realme GT Neo 3
      The Realme GT Neo 3 comes in 150W and 80W charging flavors, promising some of the fastest charging on the market.

    For a starting price of ₹36,999 for the 80W 8GB/128GB version and ₹42,999 for the 150W 12GB/256GB version, the Realme GT Neo 3 qualifies to be considered within the affordable flagship segment, and it managed to get a good podium finish. Despite that, a few of the compromises in tow keep the device from getting the top position. Realme themselves sell devices that make better sense than this: the Realme GT 2 starts at ₹34,999 and has a much better feel in the hand. In India, you can also get devices like the OnePlus 9 at around ₹37,999, though one can argue whether that’s a better choice over this considering the software update situation there. Then there’s the iQOO 9 and the iQOO 9 SE, both of which come out as much better products depending on how wide your budget is.

    All in all, the Realme GT Neo 3 is a good choice for its 80W version, but the sell becomes harder for the more expensive yet not-necessarily-better 150W version. If you’ve decided you want this phone, I would recommend buying the 80W version and saving yourself some money against experiences you may not be able to notice all the time.

    The post Realme GT Neo 3 (150W) Review: Once you fast-charge, you can never go back appeared first on XDA.



    from XDA https://ift.tt/Viw9FkR
    via IFTTT