LightBlog

dimanche 8 mai 2022

Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: The two best tablets on the market, by far

Most tech reviewers and unbiased consumers agree Apple’s iPad has been the standard-bearer for tablets, mainly because both Android and Windows aren’t nearly as optimized for the form factor (the latter particularly more so). But Samsung has been working hard to fix the problem — to make Android apps run better on a tablet screen — and the Galaxy Tab S8 series was almost certainly the best Android tablet around. But how does Samsung’s absolute best tablet offering, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, compare against Apple’s absolute best iPad offering, the iPad Pro with M1?

I’ve been using both tablets since their initial release and have jumped back and forth between them as my main “on-the-go work machine”. Obviously, I am a spoiled reviewer who can own both. The average consumer must decide on one — while I can’t say this comparison will give you a clear-cut answer, I’m going to try my best to compare the two in every meaningful category and tell you which one I’d choose if I must only keep one.

iPad Pro and Tab S8 Ultra

iPad Pro (left) and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (right).

Apple iPad Pro 2021 (12.9-inch) & Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: Specifications

Specification Apple iPad Pro (12.9-inch, 2021) Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Build
  • Aluminum frame and back
  • Glass front
  • Aluminum mid-frame and back
  • Glass front
Dimensions & Weight
  • 280.6 x 214.9 x 6.4mm
  • 682g (Wi-Fi)
  • 685g (Wi-Fi + Cellular)
  • 326.4 x 208.6 x 5.5mm
  • 726g (Wi-Fi)/728g (5G)
Display
  • 12.9-inch “Liquid Retina XDR” mini-LED display
  • 4:3 aspect ratio
  • 2048 x 2732
  • 120Hz refresh rate
  • 14.6-inch Super AMOLED
  • WQXGA+ (2960 x 1848p)
  • 240ppi
  • 120Hz refresh rate
SoC Apple M1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
RAM & Storage
  • 128GB/256GB storage
  • 512GB/1TB
  • Ram not disclosed
  • 8/12/16GB RAM
  • 128/256/512GB storage
  • microSD card support (up to 1TB)
Battery & Charging
  • 9,720 mAh
  • 18W fast charging
  • Charging brick not included
  • 11,200mAh
  • 45W wired fast charging support
  • Charging brick not included
Security Face ID In-display fingerprint scanner
Rear Cameras
  • Primary: 12MP, f/1.8
  • Secondary: 10MP, ultra-wide, f/2.4
  • Tertiary: ToF 3D LIDAR scanner
  • Primary: 13MP, AF
  • Ultra-wide: 6MP
Front Camera 12 MP, ultra-wide
  • Primary: 12MP, FF
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP
Port USB-C USB-C
Audio
  • Quad stereo speakers
  • No headphone jack
  • Quad-speaker setup tuned by AKG
  • Dolby Atmos certification
  • 3 microphones
Connectivity
  • 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6; simultaneous dual band (2.4GHz and 5GHz)
  • 5G model (A2301 and A2379)
    • 5G NR (Bands n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n71, n77, n78, n79)4
    • 5G NR mmWave (Bands n260, n261)
    • FDD-LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 71)
    • TD-LTE (Bands 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48)
    • UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC‑HSDPA (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz)
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • Wi-Fi 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2
  • 5G (optional, in some regions)
Software iOS 14.5 One UI 4.1 based on Android 12
Other Features
  • Apple Pencil support
  • S Pen included in the box
  • Microsoft Office 365 subscription

About this article: This comparison was written after months of testing a 2021 iPad Pro provided by Apple Hong Kong and a self-purchased Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra. Neither company had any input in this article.


Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy S8 Ultra: Pricing and Availability

Both the iPad Pro (2021) and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, along with other models in the series (including the smaller 11-inch iPad Pro or standard Galaxy Tab S8) are all on sale now. The 12.9-inch iPad Pro (2021) and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra both start at $1,099 for 128GB of storage and just WiFi connectivity, with prices going up for 5G connectivity and more storage.

    Apple iPad Pro (2021), 12.9-inch
    The iPad Pro is an absolute beast of a machine with a Mini LED screen with a super powerful mobile SoC.
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
    The Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is a giant tablet that can do it all. It's a work computer, gaming tablet, movie watching machine

Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: Hardware and Design

In terms of design, there isn’t too much to talk about, as just about all tablets follow the same aluminum rectangle design language. The Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra made headlines for its large (14.6-inch screen), and it is noticeably wider/taller (depending on orientation) than most tablets I’ve held. But since I’m testing the larger 12.9-inch iPad Pro (there is also an 11-incher), the size difference between the two isn’t drastic.

ipad pro and galaxy tab s8 ultra ipad pro and galaxy tab s8 ultra

They both weigh close enough, with the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra coming in at 726g and the iPad Pro at 685g (this is less than 0.1 lbs in difference for American readers), and in fact, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is thinner at 5.5mm to the iPad Pro’s 6.4mm.

ipad pro and galaxy tab s8 ultra ipad pro and galaxy tab s8 ultra

Also, I am testing both devices with their first-party keyboard cases, and Apple’s Magic Keyboard is significantly heavier, so the overall iPad Pro package including the keyboard case is heavier and bulkier than the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra package.

They both weight close enough, with the Tab coming in at 726g for the Tab and the iPad at 685g (this is less than 0.1 lbs in difference for American readers), and in fact, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is thinner at 5.5mm to the iPad Pro’s 6.4mm. They both weight close enough, with the Tab coming in at 726g for the Tab and the iPad at 685g (this is less than 0.1 lbs in difference for American readers), and in fact, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is thinner at 5.5mm to the iPad Pro’s 6.4mm.

Display and Audio

The iPad Pro 2021's Liquid XDR display. Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra screen

For the displays, it’s easy to look at numbers on a spec sheet and bezel sizes and just conclude Samsung gets the win — the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra has a 120Hz OLED panel, while the iPad Pro has a 120Hz Mini LED screen — but there are other factors that come into play in real-world usage: while the iPad Pro has thicker bezels, they’re uniform and symmetrical, while the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra screen is interrupted by a notch. And while the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra screen gets a bit brighter, both displays get more than bright enough for most cases at even 60% brightness. So unless I’m really using the tablet out in the scorching sun, the difference in maximum brightness doesn’t matter. Also, I think iPadOS is clearly more optimized for 120Hz than Samsung’s OneUI right now, as animations zip around more fluidly.

iPad Pro and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra iPad Pro and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

That’s for general use, at least. If I sit in a dark room and watch a movie, then the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra’s OLED panel will pump out deeper blacks, and due to its widescreen aspect ratio, have smaller letterboxing (those black bars sandwiching the video) too.

Both of these screens are absolutely great

I’m nitpicking ultimately, both of these screens are absolutely great. Speaker quality is excellent too: both tablets have a quad-speaker system, and I’d say they’re neck and neck in audio fidelity, and easily the two best speaker systems in any tablet.

Apple's iPad Pro 2021 Mini LED screen showing excellent contrast and deep blacks Reading comics on the Tab S8 Ultra.

Silicon

The iPad Pro is powered by Apple’s M1 silicon, and despite it being a full year older than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 powering the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, the M1 is still a more capable silicon. Now, you won’t see much of a difference when doing most daily tasks, like watching YouTube or sending emails, but if you do more intensive tasks like video editing, the M1 chip is significantly more capable. If I’m editing a 4K clip and I’m scrubbing through the timeline, it moves much faster on the M1 iPad Pro.

Rendering times are much faster, like 5x faster. However, this isn’t a direct apples-to-apples comparison, because I am using different video editing apps. But benchmark numbers also show a big win for the M1 too. Still, this won’t matter to 90% of consumers, as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is more than powerful enough.

Cameras

A close-up of the camera bump on the 2021 Apple iPad Pro Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra camera module

Both tablets pack a wide and ultra-wide camera on their backside, and they’re fine for a tablet but they’re clearly inferior sensors to what’s available on Apple and Samsung’s high-end phones. Apple’s camera system takes a clear win in that it features a LIDAR sensor too, which helps make AR apps run much better. In fact, there’s a much better selection of AR apps for iOS/iPadOS than for Android, so if AR applications are important to you, you should just stick with iPhones and iPads.

iPad Pro, main camera iPad Pro, main camera iPad Pro, ultra-wide Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, ultra-wide

A more important and widely used camera for tablets is the front-facing camera, and here, the Tab S8 Ultra camera has superior hardware. Not only does it produce sharper images and videos (the Tab S8 Ultra has a 4k lens compared to 1080p on the iPad Pro), its positioning in landscape orientation (center of the top bezel) is better than the iPad Pros’ left-bezel placement. Samsung, as usual, applies an unnatural-looking beauty filter in photos though.

For videos, both do a good job, but the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra’s camera can shoot at 4K if needed — although I’d guess not many people would want their face shown at 4K resolution. The iPad Pro applies noise-cancellation in videos, as you can clearly hear background noise more in Samsung’s footage.

It’s also worth mentioning that the iPad Pro’s front-facing camera system houses Apple’s TrueDepth camera system for FaceID. This doesn’t really factor into general video calls or selfies, but if there are AR apps that take advantage of face mapping, I’m pretty sure the iPad Pro will do a better job than the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra.

Accessories

When I test smartphones, I focus on just the device and don’t factor optional accessories into the evaluation. But for high-end tablets that market themselves as productivity powerhouse machines, it’s necessary to factor in accessories like keyboards and stylus because they’re so crucial to the overall experience.

both tablets with their keyboards both keyboards

From a value factor, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra takes the first win because its stylus, the S-Pen, is included with the package. Apple’s Pencil, on the other hand, is a $129 purchase. As for keyboards: both Apple’s Magic Keyboard and Samsung’s Book Cover Keyboard are relatively overpriced, at $349 each (if you own the smaller 11-inch iPad Pro, then the keyboard’s price drops to $299). However, Samsung has been keen to give away the keyboard accessory as a free gift upon purchase in many regions, while Apple’s Magic Keyboard has always been a full-on purchase.

Apple's Magic Keyboard Apple's Magic Keyboard

But you get what you pay for, I suppose. While Samsung’s S-Pen and keyboard case are both really good, they are not quite as good as Apple’s counterparts, which are arguably the best in the industry. The Apple Pencil feels a bit more sensitive to changes of pressure when I sketch compared to Samsung’s S-Pen, and Apple’s Magic Keyboard case, despite being quite heavy and bulky, has an ingenious design that elevates the tablet off the table top. Samsung’s keyboard case design is a clunky two-part case with a kickstand that doesn’t sit well on a lap. While both keyboards are excellent, the Magic Keyboard’s trackpad is best-in-class, giving me more precision control over the on-screen cursor than Samsung’s trackpad, which can be a bit slippery. I will talk more about the performance of both stylus and trackpad in the software section. Just know that these do factor into your overall experience unless you just want a big display tablet (which would be wasted potential).

apple's magic keybaord and samsung's keyboard cover case

Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: Software

The iPad Pro (2021) runs iPadOS 15.4, essentially a forked version of iOS 15 with superior multi-tasking abilities. The Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra runs One UI 4.1 over Android 12, it too, is very similar to the software running in Samsung’s smartphones. If you’ve used an iPhone or a Galaxy phone, both tablets can feel like a super-sized version of those devices.

At the beginning of this article, I mentioned that Android tablets have always been considered inferior to iPads, and it’s mostly due to software, as Android apps are generally not as optimized for larger landscape screens. The perfect example is Twitter, which has an optimized design for iPad screens in landscape orientation but looks absolutely stupid on Android tablet screens in the same landscape mode.

Twitter on iPad Pro in landscape orientation Twitter on Tab S8 Ultra in landscape orientation

But Samsung’s trying to fix this with DeX Mode. Essentially, DeX Mode is a sandbox UI Samsung built inside Android that mimics the UI of a traditional computer, likely a Windows one. This means Android apps can open in DeX in a freeform floating window (instead of filling the entire screen).

muti-tasking on Tab S8 Ultra twitter on tab s8 ultra

DeX mode is a godsend, because not only does it fix a lot of the app scaling issues Android tablets (and Android foldables, or any Android device with an unusual screen size) face, but it improves on multi-tasking, as I can really have up to three apps open at once and the content won’t feel too small. I can even push it to four, but things start feeling tight.

Android tablets have always been considered inferior to iPads, and it's mostly due to software -- but Samsung's trying to fix this with DeX Mode

On an iPad Pro, multi-tasking is a bit limited: you can only open two apps at the same time in a split-screen view, and at best, you can have a third app hovering, but this third app will cover a chunk of one of the split apps, so really, I wouldn’t call this running three apps at once, more like, 2.5 apps at once. You can see in the photo below, I have three apps opened on each tablet, but the iPad’s version covers up the video in an undesirable way.

multi-tasking

iPad Pro (left) and Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra multi-tasking.

Anyone who’s done office work knows the importance of having multiple windows opened at once, and I think Samsung DeX allows me to do more. However, Samsung DeX is ultimately a band-aid over the wound that is unoptimized Android apps. Until app developers put more effort to optimize for Android, or Google imposes system-wide Android rules to scale apps properly, there will always be issues, even with Samsung DeX. Right now, most apps work fine, but some apps won’t load properly. I have no such issues with the iPad Pro, almost anything I can download from the Apple App Store will run on the iPad Pro very nicely.

The only — and I mean literally only — example I have found of an app looking better on Android tablets than on iPad is Instagram. The fact it spans the entire display, and Samsung’s larger screen, make browsing through Instagram a joy — particularly when viewing attractive photos.

ipad pro galaxy tab s8 ultra

Trackpad and Stylus Support

Earlier I mentioned that while I think the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra’s keyboard trackpad and S-Pen are good, they don’t perform quite as well as Apple’s Magic Keyboard trackpad and Apple Pencil. Let’s start with the trackpad: the Magic Keyboard trackpad is unbelievably precise despite its tiny size. I seriously enjoy using it more than trackpads twice its size on a Windows machine. I’m sure it’s mostly iPadOS’ software optimization that allows the cursor to move around with such precision. I think what Apple has done is apply some gravity to apps and buttons, so when I’m dragging the mouse cursor there, it will almost snap into place when I’m almost there.

The trackpad in Samsung’s Book Cover Keyboard is slippery by comparison, sometimes a minor swipe will scroll a webpage much further down than I intended, and sometimes my mouse cursor will move past the intended target.

The iPad Pro's Magic Keyboard in white. trackpad

Trackpad gestures also make much more sense on iPadOS, because they follow the same rules we do with our thumbs on a phone. For example, the iPad trackpad gesture to exit an app/go back to the homescreen is a three-finger swipe up — which makes total sense because we have been trained for the past few years to swipe up to do the same action in our phones. But the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra flips this: to exit an app/go home, you swipe down with three fingers. Likewise, to go into app overview (that screen where you see all your recent apps) on the iPad trackpad, you swipe up and hold, just like how we’ve been doing on our phones. On the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra trackpad? It’s a three-finger swipe up. How did Samsung not realize trackpad gestures should match regular phone swipe gestures as far as possible?

Moving on to the stylus, the Apple Pencil seems to be better at adapting to various pressure as I’m sketching or jotting down notes. The Apple Pencil just feels more like an actual pencil, with the ability to shade if I tilt the Apple Pencil almost sideways on the screen.

apple pencil s-pen Shading with the Apple Pencil on the 2021 iPad Pro. Sketching on the Tab S8 Ultra

But again — the fact that the S-Pen is essentially free (included with the tablet in one set), while the Apple Pencil costs $129 extra, is no small factor. Most people would take the very good free stylus over the great but pricey stylus.


Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: Battery Life

Battery life is respectable despite both devices having such large, vivid 120Hz screens. For my usage — a web browser with a half dozen tabs open including WordPress where I write, plus Spotify streaming music and Slack running in the background, the iPad Pro fares a bit better than Samsung’s tablet, draining about 8-9% battery per hour compared to the 10-12% I see on the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra. This means, for that work scenario, both tablets can go a full eight-hour day. When I edit videos on an iPad Pro, the battery drains much faster, obviously, losing about 35% of battery in a one-hour editing session. I don’t have this same anecdotal data for the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra because I haven’t tried to edit videos on an Android device in years.


Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: Use Cases, and Final Thoughts

So, which tablet is better? It’s a very tough question to answer, because each one of these tablets excels at a different thing! I can say that after months of use, for me the iPad Pro is better as:

  • a creativity machine that allows me to sketch, edit photos in Lightroom, and edit videos with LumaFusion at a high level
  • general use tablet for carrying around the house, or lounging on the sofa/laying in bed because the iPad has a better app eco-system and the iPad Pro is a bit easier to hold for extended periods due to its smaller size

But the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is better as:

  • a traditional office-type work machine, because DeX allows me to open more windows, and Android has a more natural, straightforward file system compared to Apple’s abstract, complicated one
  • a pure movie-watching machine, because it has a better screen with a more suitable aspect ratio.

If the value is a factor, then the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is a better value because you get the free S-Pen and potentially the keyboard case too, but the iPad Pro has a better hardware eco-system — you can use the iPad Pro as a secondary monitor for MacBooks, and AirDrop files between iPhone and iPad. Yes, yes, I know Samsung is working on building this level of synergy too, but it’s not quite there.

Now, to answer “which one would I pick if I must choose one?”, I’d have to go with the iPad Pro for the superior video editing prowess and better app eco-system. However, I absolutely adore the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra and think it’s the best Android tablet by far, and Samsung’s done enough here to challenge the previously inarguable “the best tablet is the iPad” statement. Now, it’s at least a debate.

    Apple iPad Pro (2021), 12.9-inch
    The iPad Pro is an absolute beast of a machine with a Mini LED screen with a super powerful mobile SoC.
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
    The Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is a giant tablet that can do it all. It's a work computer, gaming tablet, movie watching machine

The post Apple iPad Pro (2021) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: The two best tablets on the market, by far appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/79z3WZ4
via IFTTT

samedi 7 mai 2022

XGIMI Aura Smart Projector Review: Performance meets convenience

If you told me you had a 100″ projector screen mounted up in your home bedroom, I’d probably think you were crazy. Most sane people would simply set up a smart TV for their comfort zone — but why not a smart projector? People tend to think of the theaters or full-fledged home cinema systems when they hear the word. But lately, some projector makers have set out to make their products more home- and user-friendly, offering an all-in-one “home theater in a box” that looks natural in a home setting and is easy to set up and use.

The Aura 4K Ultra Short Throw is one such product from XGIMI, which the company pitches as a projector that can replace your home TV. Find out how feasible it is to do so and how well it performs in this review, which I test in the comfort of my own bedroom.

    XGIMI Aura 4K Laser Ultra-Short Throw
    The Aura laser short throw is XGIMI's latest flagship projector that combines performance with style and simplicity

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

About this review: XGIMI sent us an Aura projector for review. The company had no involvement in the contents of this review.


XGIMI Aura: Style & Setup

Since the XGIMI Aura is a piece of equipment that is meant to blend into your home setting, looks do matter. There’s a metric often used in the audio-video community called the Wife Acceptance Factor (WAF), which is a gauge for how likely your significant other would be okay with having a particular contraption in the room.

In a living room, the XGIMI Aura gets high WAF marks: it has a nice fabric front that conceals four Harman Kardon 15W drivers, and a sleek silver top accent that lends the set-top some presence. Measuring about 24 inches wide, 16 inches deep, and 6 inches high, the Aura doesn’t particularly disappear in a room — the room may still have to be designed around it. This is typically the part of owning a projector that plummets the WAF, but you just have to let the results speak for themselves.

The XGIMI Aura is a sleek-looking set-top, but its size may make it difficult to position

Something that’s going to replace a TV should be able to last a long time. No one likes replacing TV backlights or lamp bulbs. XGIMI claims that the laser light source inside its Aura projector can last up to 25,000 hours, which should last about 17 years if you’re using it four hours a day. I’m not the most energy-conservant person at times, so longevity is an extremely important quality for any display to have in my book. Some days, I’ll leave shows or videos running in the background, and on others, I’ll have it slideshow through my photos just for the ambiance. I’d be wary about leaving any lamp-based projector turned on, and even with my current OLED, burn-in is definitely a concern by doing this. If XGIMI’s 25,000-hour claim is accurate, then the Aura should give you peace of mind to act irresponsibly with your screen time.

Part of being an all-in-one system is having a smart OS that’s intuitive and easy to use. The XGIMI Aura boots Android TV 10.0, bundled with Chromecast for ubiquitous content streaming. If you’re familiar with Android’s OS, Aura’s interface will feel right at home. Even if you don’t, the interface is straightforward and quick to navigate. With Android TV, you can install all the popular streaming service apps, like Hulu, Prime Video, HBO Max, or Peacock. Netflix isn’t readily supported, but there are some workarounds for this floating around the internet if you look.

Bottom of XGIMI Aura. Yes, I’m using a cardboard box for some extra height.

To help position the short throw, there are four height-adjustable stoppers at the bottom to fine-tune the projection skew and height. There’s no form of physical lens adjustment, but the Aura does have an 8-point electronic keystone correction, which should be fiddled with as little as possible if you want the sharpest image.

XGIMI Aura’s rear I/O ports

Many people using this projector will be likely content using its built-in OS, but for those that want to connect external devices, the XGIMI Aura provides three HDMI 2.0 ports, with one supporting ARC. There’s also an optical and an analog 3.5mm port for hooking up a soundbar or bookshelves. If you want to play some files from a thumb drive, there are also two USB 2.0 ports, and for a wired internet connection there’s an ethernet port for that. If you stick to wireless, just be warned that the built-in OS does not support Wi-Fi 6.

XGIMI Aura remote

Controlling the projector is a tall, narrow aluminum-cased remote with black plastic trimmings for the buttons. It looks sleek, and it’s the same remote that XGIMI provides for its Horizon projectors. There’s a nice heft to it, although I personally dislike handling aluminum casings. The button locations are simple to memorize, and they’re textured differently to help with feeling them out. Besides the standard buttons like back/menu/home/volume, the Aura remote also has a dedicated button for quick settings, voice control, and auto-focus. Inside the quick settings menu are options to change the picture mode, the sound settings, HDMI settings, and keystone corrections. I would have liked for the lamp brightness to be adjustable within the quick settings, but instead, it’s located a little deeper within the main projector settings.

As for the ability to adjust picture calibration, the tuning controls on the XGIMI Aura are somewhat limited. There are a few picture mode presets within the quick settings, though they don’t actually vary too much from one another except for the Game preset, which significantly lowers input latency. For more granular control, the Custom picture mode offers adjustments for Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, Sharpness, Noise Reduction, Color Temperature, and Motion Compensation. Setting Color Temperature to Custom allows for one-point RGB adjustments, which functions well enough to target a consistent white balance for the entire grayscale. However, there aren’t any tone mapping or gamma controls, which is extremely disappointing for a display device of this price. There are also no color management controls, though this isn’t really necessary due to the light source’s small gamut. There’s an option that alters the strength of the Local Contrast, but from my testing, the feature does almost nothing even in its strongest setting.

Impressions

Replacing a 65″ OLED on my wall is a 100″ ambient light-rejecting projector screen made for ultra-short-throws. OLED TVs are an extremely high bar to compare picture quality against, but that is the price point the Aura is competing with. Initially, I tested the XGIMI Aura onto a plain white wall in my living room, but stray light from windows easily washed out the picture coming from the projector, even at its brightest setting. With an ALR projector screen installed, the Aura produces an adequate image even during the daytime. However, such a screen could run you an additional $600 USD or more.

For about $2,499 USD, the XGIMI Aura is competing with 77-inch OLEDs, so that’s the sizing I should be comparing the Aura to. Even at that size, a 100-inch diagonal provides almost twice the surface area as a 77-inch TV, so there’s still a staggering difference. Sitting from 12 feet away, the difference between my 65-inch and 100 inches is a totally different world. Despite the objectively superior picture quality of an OLED, the experience created by a vision-enveloping image cannot be substituted. Movie-theater aficionados at THX recommend a screen viewing angle of about 36 degrees, and a 77″ screen would cover only about 26 degrees from my seating position.

Many videophiles will butt in with a preference for quality over quantity, which I totally understand. As someone who spends way too much time in the picture settings when watching a movie, picture fidelity is a legitimate concern and a high priority for me. The projectors I’ve used in the past, they either did not perform well enough or were too inconvenient to completely replace a TV. Although the picture quality of the XGIMI Aura doesn’t hold a candle to any OLED, I’d say the projector’s output is decent enough that I can forget to worry about the lack thereof when truly immersed in a scene.

That being said, as a color purist, it takes a certain degree of picture fidelity and color accuracy so that I don’t get constantly annoyed. Last year, I reviewed the XGIMI Horizon Pro, and despite its versatility and ease of use, I could not replace any of my TVs with it due to its poor contrast and unfixable oversaturation. The XGIMI Aura’s laser light source improves just enough on both those means for me to feel better with upsizing.

Casual gaming on the Aura has been delightful, and it’s totally viable when the Game picture preset is selected. Potentially coordinated games like Fall Guys and It Takes Two were playable as normal, but twitch-reactive games take an obvious hit compared to a fast monitor. All video post-processing and picture adjustments are disabled in Game mode to achieve low latency, which is a shame; basic settings like white balance, brightness, and contrast should be computationally cheap enough to have almost no effect on latency. It would also be nice if the Aura supported Auto Low-Latency Mode so that I don’t need to manually toggle Game mode. Lastly, the projector’s refresh rate only officially supports 60 Hz without any variable refresh rate, which keeps it in the realm of purely casual gamers.

Audio coming from the Aura is surprisingly well-bodied. Simply put, it’s better than any TV speakers that I’ve heard and is comparable to budget-level bookshelves. Dialog is very clear thanks to multiple forward-facing drivers, and DSP does a good job squeezing out some low-end. They get louder than I’d ever need them to be within my own room, and I’d say they’re capable of filling out a living room without distorting to all hell near max volume. Those that want to maintain a minimalistic setup will likely be happy with just the audio from these. And since the Aura comes with Android TV with Chromecast, it’s effortless to cast your favorite music in a pinch from your smartphone.

Performance & Measurements

The specs coming from the XGIMI Aura seem as expected from a projector in the $2000—3000 price range. It uses a 0.47″ DMD with pixel shifting to achieve a true 4K image, and it’s rated up for up to 2400 ANSI lumens. It has a throw ratio of 0.233:1, which can project a 100″ diagonal at a depth of about 8.2″ from the wall. Since it’s an ultra-short throw, more of its lumen output is retained when projected onto a screen compared to a normal throw projector, so 2400 lumens goes a long way. With my 100-inch 0.6-gain projector screen, I measured a maximum screen luminance of about 110 nits, which fares well in a light-controlled living room.

Custom picture settings used for the XGIMI Aura

In the projector’s native configuration, I measured a static full on/off contrast ratio of about 2500:1 for the XGIMI Aura, which is pretty good for a DLP projector. This level of contrast is comparable to a mid-range TV without dynamic backlighting, so in terms of quality, it’s nothing to write home about. But when it’s shown at a much larger picture size, mid-range TV quality looks surprisingly good. High-end projectors offer a dynamic iris that can modulate the light output scene-to-scene for maximum contrast, but the Aura sadly doesn’t possess such a feature. Nevertheless, its level of contrast still makes for an enjoyably deep picture, and I prefer mid-level static contrast to a dynamic contrast implementation that can manifest artifacts.

The bad news is that the XGIMI Aura’s native light source puts out a large amount of blue energy, and the out-of-the-box white balance is excessively cold. Typically, there’s a picture preset on most displays that offer a decent level of color accuracy, but such a setting is absent from the XGIMI Aura. One would think that XGIMI’s Movie preset would be that setting, but in this setting, the white balance still measures north of 9000 K. The picture preset needs to be set to Custom to adjust the white balance closer to reference, but even the Warm white balance preset is too cold.

Calibrating the white balance channels towards industry-standard D65 requires removing much of this blue light energy, which significantly reduces the image contrast. Once that’s done, the static contrast of the XGIMI Aura drops down to about 1500:1, which is just okay, but approaching mediocre for the price.

Before going further into the projector’s output measurements, it’s important to know that there are different standards for viewing conditions between projectors and TVs. With respect to industry standards, TVs are expected to be watched with dim lighting, while projectors are typically viewed in the darkest surroundings possible. Accordingly, the expected amount of light coming from the screen is different for the two technologies: TVs are often calibrated to a white level of 100 nits, while projectors are calibrated for about 50 nits. These values depend on the actual viewing environment of course, but we stick to using these values for standard measurements.

Tone mapping for XGIMI Aura, measured at 18% APL

In TV Land, the standard tone response is a gamma power of around 2.40. There isn’t a clear-cut standard for projectors, but many calibrators just carry over the 2.40 gamma power response, which I feel is a mistake. Since the viewing conditions are different between TVs and projectors, using the same tone response doesn’t translate to the same perceived image contrast; the projector’s image would have less detail in the highlights with accentuation in the shadows. There is another picture standard, called BT.1886, which I use to compare to the XGIMI Aura instead. This curve takes into consideration both the contrast and the brightness of the display to form a tailored tone response that maintains the relative structure of the 2.40 gamma power as seen on an ideal display.

After D65 calibration and setting the lamp brightness to about 50 nits, the XGIMI Aura outputs a display gamma of about 2.10. A single gamma power value isn’t appropriate for characterizing the projector’s output, however; the Aura’s tone mapping has a slight S-Curve, sacrificing details in the highlights to achieve steeper contrast. From my viewing tests, it doesn’t go over-the-top, and it still presents scenes naturally with a pleasant boost to punchiness. Bright regions are slightly blown out, and although shadows are undertracked, they still appeared legible when viewed in the dark. It’s a good compromise that takes advantage of the viewing conditions of projectors, but I would still prefer the ability to adjust the toning closer to the BT.1886 curve.

Grayscale precision for XGIMI Aura, measured at 18% APL

White balance consistency is excellent throughout the Aura’s grayscale. This makes up for the one-point white balance adjustment since all gray points track to whatever it’s set to. Multi-point adjustment is still important, though, so that the tone mapping can be adjusted. The only outlier is 100% white, which steers slightly colder than the rest of the grayscale. Dialing the Contrast setting down to 48 brings it in line with the rest of the points.

Arriving at the weakest part of the XGIMI Aura is its color representation. The maximum color gamut of the laser light source only covers about 93% of Rec.709 or about 76% of DCI-P3 (with respect to ICtCp). This together with its static contrast means that HDR content sees almost no benefit on the XGIMI Aura, despite its capabilities of playing them back.

In terms of color accuracy, the Aura also measures poorly. Even after calibrating the white point as close to D65 as possible, the average color error still measures about ΔETP = 11, far past the visual threshold of 3.0, with errors extending to ΔETP = 36. Deep blue color mixtures become highly oversaturated and skewed in hue; skies are slightly indigo and teal colors are straight cyan. Pure reds and greens aren’t too bad, though yellows appear somewhat neon. Fortunately, some critical memory colors like skin tones and foliage are represented pretty accurately. This is the saving grace of this entire mess, since distorting other colors is much more tolerable compared to these critical colors.

Photo comparison of HDR content played back on native XGIMI OS vs external HDMI device. HDR playback in native OS appears correct with natural tone mapping while external devices result in black crush.

As I’ve previously mentioned, the Aura’s performance makes it a bad fit for playing back HDR content. This is true for most projectors and not just the XGIMI Aura; the technology is still mostly limited by its lack of simultaneous contrast and light output. Some high-end projectors try to circumvent this shortcoming with dynamic tone mapping, but that feature shouldn’t be expected for the Aura’s price.

Something else that I’ve noticed with the XGIMI projector is that it messes up HDR10 rendering if it’s not being played back within the native OS. On external HDMI devices, the entire contrast curve appears steeper, crushing shadow details and making dark scenes appear blotchy. Colors also become skewed if the external device switches the working color space to Rec.2020 when playing HDR10. If you insist on watching HDR content outside the native OS, it helps to increase the Aura’s Brightness setting to 52 and to make sure it stays within the Rec.709 picture mode. In the end, I would recommend just watching the SDR master of shows and movies on the XGIMI Aura, unless the HDR version comes in a substantially higher bitrate.

Final Verdict

The XGIMI Aura is an overall excellent performer, albeit with some major “but”s. Its total package is tailored for the casual watcher that wants a nice, big picture and big sound with a simple interface all in one. In terms of picture quality, the Aura laser outputs a sharp, bright and punchy image, and I have no doubt the XGIMI Aura is enough to completely wow its watchers in most living rooms (because it did, in my case). However, for something that’s competing with large, high-end TVs, I wish it could check off more boxes.

From the viewpoint of a home-theater enthusiast, it can be really hard to recommend a video product without expert color controls. Such is the case with XGIMI — and for the projector’s price bracket, the Aura almost seemed like a non-starter. It was an obstacle I could not look past with XGIMI’s entry-level Horizon Pro projector, and now I’m reassessing the same issue on an even more expensive product. The overall picture quality of the Aura laser projector is definitely a marked improvement over the Horizon Pro, but the question of if it can replace a high-end TV remains complicated.

When I’m not trying to get absorbed in a cinematic piece, an OLED TV is still much more convenient: it takes up much less space, it starts up faster, it’s much better for gaming, and it makes me less guilty about leaving a show playing in the background. But when it comes down to it, my movie-watching experience with the XGIMI Aura has been substantially better than with my 65-inch OLED. Big sound and big scenes require a big screen, so however impeccable my OLED looks, it doesn’t come close to recreating the atmospheric chaos of a title like King Kong vs. Godzilla. And as I’ve mentioned, the Aura can look colorimetrically decent enough to not completely degrade the artistic integrity of most scenes.

My takeaway is that the XGIMI Aura is an excellent replacement for a TV if reference-level color accuracy isn’t an absolute top priority. I believe the XGIMI Aura provides just enough convenience and image fidelity to satisfy most movie-watchers, including both casual and semi-critical viewers. Any sort of serious gaming isn’t recommended, but casual gameplay on the XGIMI Aura makes for a unique, immersive experience. There’s still a ton of room for improvement in home projectors, but in the meantime, I’m comfortable with the XGIMI Aura occupying one of my rooms.

    XGIMI Aura 4K Laser Ultra-Short Throw
    The Aura laser short throw is XGIMI's latest flagship projector that combines performance with style and simplicity

The post XGIMI Aura Smart Projector Review: Performance meets convenience appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/ix5fBj8
via IFTTT

Brydge Stone Pro TB4 Docking Station review: The dock that seems to have everything

There are a lot of choices in Thunderbolt docks out there, and the Brydge Stone Pro TB4 Docking Station is an excellent one. What it comes down to what ports you need. And with Thunderbolt 4, there’s a lot of flexibility to what dock-makers can do.

Brydge included a trio of Thunderbolt ports on the back, and a trio of USB Type-A ports. Some companies, like Belkin, have foregone some of those Thunderbolt ports in favor of HDMI ports. Indeed, you’ll have to use USB Type-C to connect your displays here. If you’ve only got HDMI or DisplayPort, don’t worry; adapters are sold.

What’s nice about having those three Thunderbolt ports instead of, say, HDMI, is that you get more flexibility. In my use of it, I used two of them to connect 4K monitors, and that’s it. You can use one to connect an external GPU if you want too.

    Brydge Stone Pro TB4
    The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 seems to have it all, with four Thunderbolt ports, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, and 90 watts of power for charging.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

Brydge Stone Pro TB4 price and availability

  • The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 is available as of May 3, 2022, and it will run you $329.99.

Brydge has finally announced the successor to its Stone Pro Thunderbolt 3 dock, and naturally, it’s called the Brydge Stone Pro TB4. It’s available now, and like most Thunderbolt docks, it’s not cheap. The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 only comes in black, and it will run you $329.99.

Right now, you can grab one from either Brydge or Amazon.

Brydge Stone Pro TB4 specs

Compatibility COMPUTERS
Windows 10 & 11, macOS & ChromeOS devices
MONITOR SUPPORT
Single or dual displayNote: The 2020 MacBook Air & 13-inch MacBook Pro equipped with the Apple M1 chip do not support multiple displays. Stone Pro TB4 can still be used for a 5K/60 Hz single display and Thunderbolt 4 speeds.Stone Pro TB4 does support dual displays on the new M1 MAX and M1 Pro MacBooks.
Size and weight SIZE
Length: 7.8 in (198 mm)
Width: 2.95 in (75 mm)
Height: 1.2 in (31 mm)
WEIGHT
0.75 lbs (338 g)
Display Support USING THUNDERBOLT PORT:
Single @ 8K/30 Hz
Dual @ 4K/60 Hz
USING DISPLAYPORT:
N/A – No DisplayPort
Speed and Power SPEED
Thunderbolt 4
POWER SUPPLY
1 x Power Supply (135 W)
CHARGING CAPABILITY
Every Stone Pro offers a full 90 watts of power for charging your computer.
Ports and Material 11 PORTS
3 x Thunderbolt 4
1 x USB-A (2.0 5V/1.5A)
3 x USB-A (3.3 Gen 2 10 Gb/s)
1 x Thunderbolt™ 4 PD 3.0 90W
1 x SD Card (SD4.0UHS-II)
1 x Ethernet (Gigabit)
1 x Audio/Mic
1 x Dock Power
BODY MATERIAL
Aluminum/Plastic
Warranty WARRANTY
1-Year Warranty
What’s in the box ITEMS
1 x Stone Pro TB4 Docking Station
1 x Vertical Stand
1 x User Manual
Laptop not included.
Cables not included. See the
recommended setup information below.
Price $329.99

About this review: Brydge shared the Stone Pro TB4 with us for review. It did not have any input in this review.

Design: The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 comes in black, and with lots of ports

The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 comes in any color that you want, as long as it’s black. It’s interesting to me that that’s the only option, since its predecessor was silver. Obviously, black is probably the most mainstream colorway for a home office environment. Still, if you’re looking for something in a different color, like silver, to pair with your Thunderbolt 4 laptop and match up with your office, you have to look elsewhere.

Angled view of vertical docks

One thing that’s nice is that you have the option of placing the docking station horizontally or vertically. This just gives you a little bit more flexibility with how it can sit on your desk.

Angled view of front of Brydge Stone Pro TB4

Now, let’s talk about ports, because that’s probably what’s most important to you when choosing a dock. On the front of the Brydge Stone Pro TB4, you’ll find an SD card reader, the Thunderbolt port that connects to your laptop, a 3.5mm audio jack, and a USB 2.0 Type-A port. Of course, things like a full-size SD card slot and a headphone jack are key. An SD card slot is so rare for a laptop these days, so you’ll want that on an expensive docking station.

I do take issue with the USB 2.0 port though. As you can see by the icon, this is seemingly aimed at charging your devices, which is useful. The problem is that it’s even more useful to have a proper USB 3.2 port on the front of the dock, for peripherals that you might plug in and unplug somewhat frequently. And for many accessories, you won’t want to accidentally plug them into a USB 2.0 port.

Rear view of Brydge Stone Pro TB4

On the back, you’ll find three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and three Thunderbolt 4 ports, along with an Ethernet port. All the way to the left is the power jack, and yes, you will need to plug this docking station in for it to work. That’s true of any Thunderbolt dock, and it will charge your laptop as well. Indeed, this thing can output up to 90W.

Those three USB Type-A ports are about as fast as it gets. There’s a 20Gbps USB spec called USB 3.2 2×2, but it’s hard to find anywhere. USB 3.2 Gen 2 gets you 10Gbps, and you’ll be pretty happy with it.

And then there are the three Thunderbolt 4 ports. You can use one of these to connect an external GPU if you want, which will give your laptop a real boost. And of course, you can connect your monitors to those ports, which is probably what you’re going to want to do. So, you’ll either need a USB-C monitor, or another adapter.

I own a few DisplayPort to USB-C dongles, for these types of use cases. I have to say, I do understand why there are no DisplayPorts or HDMI ports. When you start adding those, you have to start removing the extra Thunderbolt ports, and now you’re limiting the versatility of the device. But as a man that wants everything and reserves the right to complain about anything, I’ll say I wish I had a pair of DisplayPorts.

All-in-all, this is a pretty sweet dock. It has the right array of ports to get what you need out of it. Those two trios of ports on the back should get you everything that you need.

Who should buy the Brydge Stone Pro TB4?

The Brydge Stone Pro TB4 is a great Thunderbolt dock, but it’s not for everyone.

Who should buy the Brydge Stone Pro TB4:

  • Gamers and creators that want to take an ultrabook and boost it with desktop-grade discrete graphics
  • People with a lot of high-bandwidth peripherals (like a 4K webcam) and can use those USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports

Who should not buy the Brydge Stone Pro TB4:

  • Anyone with an AMD laptop
  • Users that don’t, and won’t need the benefits of Thunderbolt over a standard USB-C hub

The two big reasons not to buy it are the reasons to not buy a Thunderbolt laptop at all. This is a really expensive item if you’re just going to use it as a way to plug in your old USB Type-A keyboard, mouse, and headset, along with a 1080p monitor or two. For me personally, I need to connect 4K monitors, so I run into issues when I review a laptop that doesn’t have Thunderbolt.

The post Brydge Stone Pro TB4 Docking Station review: The dock that seems to have everything appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/tw7Dqlr
via IFTTT