LightBlog

samedi 21 mars 2020

How the Iris 5 chip from Pixelworks can improve the visual experience of Android smartphones

Smartphone screens continue to improve in visual quality every year in typical ways like color accuracy, color gamut, and brightness. However, we’ve come to a point where many of the technical advancements in even the top-tier displays are now imperceptible or unnoticed. Panel vendors and OEMs are constantly trying to come up with new ways, besides “just make it bigger” and form factor, to make the most engaging part of your phone even more attractive. Pixelworks and their Iris visual processor aim to improve the smartphone display experience by integrating unique display features and adaptive elements based on human visual perception.

Black Shark 2 / Pixelworks Promo

Pixelworks and the Iris 5 visual processor

Pixelworks has mostly been low-profile in the smartphone space, but the company has been working with video and display solutions for about twenty years. They debuted their first partnership with a smartphone maker in 2016 with ASUS on the ZenFone 3 Ultra, integrating an early version of their Iris visual processor. Their most noteworthy smartphone collaborations to date include the Nokia 6.2/7.2, the ASUS ROG Phone, and just recently, the Black Shark 3 and the OPPO Find X2. The latter two phones include the newest fifth generation of Pixelwork’s Iris processor. The Iris 5, along with the company’s software which they coin “Soft Iris”, are responsible for the company’s display-facing features, which we’ll get to later.

Pixelworks’ key customers and partners

The Iris chip is a display processor that sits between the device SoC and the display driver IC, connecting to both via the MIPI DSI, supporting dual MIPI. However, for me, this raises immediate concerns for display latency and video hardware acceleration: any bandwidth/stream compression requires additional decoding on the Iris chip so that pixel data can be processed, then it’s re-encoded and sent to the DDIC where it must be decoded again. Furthermore, many video apps utilize display acceleration by directly rendering a chroma-subsampled pixel format through MIPI; I imagine that some of the Iris 5’s frame operations may require subsampled display data to be first converted to RGB before processing and recomposition. Brief preliminary findings of ours also hint that some of the Iris 5’s features don’t work with full hardware-accelerated video playback. We reached out to Pixelworks if they could provide any details about the processing pipeline or architectural information about their Iris chip, but they declined to provide details.

Arbitrary display “enhancements”

Many display “enhancements” that OEMs provide generally involve artificial and arbitrary picture adjustments that may skew the artistic intent of content. One common way that smartphone OEMs help their displays to stand out is by using a very vibrant color profile that expands all the colors on the screen to appear more saturated than originally intended. This is also usually accompanied by a blue-ish white point, which most consumers find more appealing than the standard white point known as D65.

Both of these characteristics were originally artifacts of crude color calibration and the lack of color management in past displays, but improvements to both have been poorly received by many; accurate colors have a common perception as being the constraint of display color, while the standard white point appears warmer than what most people had been used to.

To remain attractive to consumers, smartphone makers had to continue to artificially oversaturate their screen color and to use a colder white point. This is done by many OEMs even to this day. Samsung had been notorious for shipping all their OLED phones with oversaturated displays, but they stopped this practice with the Galaxy S10 and they now ship them with an accurate color profile in most parts of the world (with exception of their in-store demo units, which understandingly defaults to that vibrant color profile to compare with the others that do, too).

Improving display fidelity: Pixelworks’ adaptive adjustments

It takes more than a “well-calibrated” display for an accurate viewing experience. Lighting conditions in a display’s viewing environment can significantly alter the look of content on the display. For content to look right, it should ideally be viewed in the environment that it was mastered for. And for this reason, color standards that displays conform to also impose a reference viewing environment for which those colors appear accurate. When viewing the display in other environments, the colors on the display may appear incorrect. Thus, a “well-calibrated” display should also be calibrated for its viewing environment.

Smartphones, however, are used in all sorts of viewing environments: outside in the bright sunlight, in bed at night, or perhaps in a venue with multi-colored lights. All these different environments change the perceived look of the content on your smartphone’s screen.

Pixelworks’ auto-adaptive displays

Pixelworks focuses on improving display accuracy in these real-world conditions and recreating the artistic intent of the content creator. Instead of frivolous boosts to image contrast/quality/saturation, Pixelwork’s solutions are based on improving content fidelity by adjusting the display and its contents to adapt to ambient conditions.

Here’s what Pixelworks and their Iris 5 chip can do:

  • Factory display calibration
    First and foremost, Pixelworks tells us that they take responsibility for the full display calibration job of the phones that they work with. They perform individual display calibrations of every unit at the factory, and they claim that their calibration results are within delta E < 1 of their targets — we have not yet reviewed a display with Pixelworks’ calibration to verify this, so we’re currently skeptical about this claim. The Iris 5 is also capable of handling the color management for a device, but since Pixelworks works closely with Qualcomm, it is generally left to the Snapdragon and its display processor.
  • Real-time motion processing on the Iris 5
    Motion processing, when done right, is a key component in reducing judder and in dealing with framerate mismatch. Pixelworks emphasizes that this is not to be confused with generic motion interpolation, which results in the nefarious “soap opera effect“. We’re told that their motion processing preserves the intended motion appearance of content and adapts it to the type of content and to the environment. This is important since many films are not intended to have super-smooth motion, while perhaps a sports stream should. Additionally, the perception of judder increases with the contrast of the content, and contrast is further affected by the viewing environment. Pixelworks claims that they compensate for both these factors in their motion processing. This is especially important for HDR content, which has the potential for very high contrast. The motion processing is also said to work for mobile games. Pixelworks has previously won the Hollywood Professional Association (HPA) Award and the Advanced Imaging Society’s (AIS) Entertainment Technology Lumiere Award for their TrueCut motion grading video platform used in cinema films.
  • Automatic display white balance & contrast adjustments
    Mentioned earlier, the appearance of content on a display changes depending on the viewing environment. Pixelworks deals with the effects that ambient brightness and color have that changes your perception of colors on a display. A warmer viewing environment will make a display’s white balance appear relatively colder — and vice versa– an effect known as chromatic adaptation. To compensate, a display should adjust its colors towards the color of the ambient light so that the display appears perceptually similar under different color lighting. Many phones now provide this feature, arguably popularized by Apple’s True Tone which was introduced in their 9.7-inch iPad Pro. However, True Tone only adapts to ambient color, while ambient brightness has a further effect on the contrast of a screen. The brighter the ambient light (relative to the display), the darker the colors on the screen appear, compressing towards black. And the brighter the display (relative to the ambient light), the lighter the colors on the screen appear, compressing towards white. This is known as the Bartleson-Breneman effect, and Pixelworks is capable of compensating for this by adjusting the system gamma and using local contrast enhancement. However, the details of correctly implementing this are intensely complicated, from perceptual measurements to the mapped display pixel values. Samsung is one other smartphone OEM that considers this, though only for sunlight high brightness mode.
    OPPO Find X2 Pro color sensors

    The positions of the two 6-channel color sensors on the OPPO Find X2 Pro are indicated in red. Source: OPPO. Retrieved via: GSMArena.

  • DC dimming to prevent OLED flicker
    In most phones with an OLED screen, the display brightness is adjusted by quickly flickering the screen on-and-off, a method called pulse-width modulation (PWM). For most phones, this flickering happens at about 240 times per second, and the resulting display brightness depends on how long the display is in the “on” state. However, some consumers claim to have induced headaches from this flickering, and it’s exacerbated at lower display brightness levels. DC dimming attempts to remedy this by instead adjusting the display brightness via traditional analog control. While this eliminates the flickering, display calibration and uniformity can be negatively impacted since changes in an OLED’s voltage can significantly alter its output characteristics. However, we may be seeing OLEDs with higher DAC bit-depths, which can rely more on the current to adjust the amplitude of the individual LEDs.
  • SDR-to-HDR conversion for videos and games
    The Iris 5 is capable of converting standard content into HDR. Pixelworks declined to state how exactly they’re doing this, but it’s done in real-time on the Iris 5 DSP. We’re told that the HDR output format is based on HLG and that that conversion works alongside their other adaptive features. I wrote a whole precursor about arbitrary display enhancements, so this feature sort of feels like a slap to the face. Pixelworks rationalizes that there is a drought of HDR content that’s available and that this feature allows us to take advantage of our display hardware’s current capabilities. However, I’ll reserve harsher judgment until I can demo this feature.
  • HDR10 for low- and mid-range devices
    While HDR10 is typically reserved for more-premium devices, Pixelworks can collaborate with mid-range and budget devices to bring “certified HDR” to the masses. The Iris 5 supports native 10-bit processing, which most budget SoCs don’t support. Cheap mobile displays are now capable of at least the 95% DCI-P3 and about 400 nits with 1000:1 static contrast, which can serve a passable mobile HDR experience for the price. In addition, for LCDs the Iris 5 can manage the display backlight, employing dynamic backlight control for reduced power consumption and improved dynamic contrast. Most LCDs are already capable of this, however.

The “Natural Tone Display” and the “O1 Ultra Vision Engine” are features found on the OPPO Find X2 Pro. These features are powered by Pixelworks’ Iris 5 visual processor.

Pixelworks and their chip also provide some other minor features, such as video upscaling and sharpness/edge enhancements, and they claim that the Iris 5 can offload some display processing from the SoC. Embedded below is a promotional video the company shared that highlights the main features of Pixelworks’ visual processor. We uploaded the video to YouTube with permission from Pixelworks, but if you prefer to watch the uncompressed video, you can do so here from the Pixelworks website.

 

The improvements that Pixelworks claims to bring are all sound and dandy on paper, but I’m yet to experience the actual effectiveness of these features. None are entirely new ideas, but at the same time, none of them have been implemented very well on a smartphone. From these features, the concept of adapting display contrast to the environment is arguably the most important in further improving content fidelity in a world where every flagship phone seems to have an “A+ display” with colors “indistinguishable from perfect” (not actually). Along with what Pixelworks touts as “industry-leading” factory display calibration, I’m eager to see how this all performs when I get my hands on a phone with their latest Iris 5 chip.

Pixelworks reached out to brief us about their product and services. The opinions written above are my own.

The post How the Iris 5 chip from Pixelworks can improve the visual experience of Android smartphones appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/395yj0d
via IFTTT

Developer ports Ubuntu Touch to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7

There was a time when you could slap any operating system on the mythical HTC HD2, be it Android, Ubuntu, or even Windows RT. The Samsung Galaxy S III and Galaxy Note II are gradually taking up that mantle, as it is possible to install regular GNU/Linux distributions on them with very little effort. While you can satisfy the urge of having a “true Linux phone” by getting the Librem 5 or PinePhone, their hardware configurations are unfortunately dated. Several community-driven projects, such as UBports and postmarketOS, are trying to bridge the gap between regular consumer Android devices and mainstream Linux distributions, and Project Halium plays a huge role in this development scene. Now, XDA Recognized Developer erfanoabdi has decided to dip his toe in this particular domain, as he has ported Ubuntu Touch to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 XDA Forums

A notable name in the Android modding community, erfanoabdi is known for his works on the Generic System Image (GSI) ports as well as maintaining LineageOS for various Motorola phones. According to the developer, the existing port of Ubuntu Touch for the F(x)tec Pro1 by Halium developer NotKit helped him to get started with the “hacking” job. Danct12, who previously ported Ubuntu Touch to the Xiaomi Redmi 4X, is responsible for creating the preliminary device trees that are used by erfanoabdi in this journey. Danct12 has also posted a teaser showing Ubuntu Touch being booted on the Redmi Note 7.

erfanoabdi has already uploaded pre-built images, but the port is nothing but a proof of concept at this moment. The touch and Hardware Composer (display with acceleration) are working, and you can even utilize the Wi-Fi, but that’s about it. If you want to bite the bullet, then you have to flash erfanoabdi’s self-compiled LineageOS 16.0 build for the Redmi Note 7 first to populate the vendor partition, followed by the pre-compiled system.img, dtbo.img, and hallium-boot.img from the aforementioned mirror. Afterward, you must get your hands on the patched UBports rootfs and install it using the Halium installer script. If everything goes right, you should be able to SSH into your phone at this stage. However, setting up the appropriate mountpoints and starting LightDM (i.e. the graphical display manager) still require a handful of shell commands.

Redmi Note 7 Ubuntu Touch Redmi Note 7 Ubuntu Touch Redmi Note 7 Ubuntu Touch redmi_note_7_ubuntu_touch_4 redmi_note_7_ubuntu_touch_5 redmi_note_7_ubuntu_touch_6

Due to the introduction of Project Treble, a major rearchitecting of Android to separate the Android framework code from the hardware vendor implementation, Halium developers have to rewrite a major portion of libhybris (a compatibility layer to reuse the existing Android drivers). Nonetheless, this reshaping might be helpful to turn the Ubuntu Touch distribution to a GSI in the near future, as hinted by erfanoabdi.


Source: Twitter (1, 2)

The post Developer ports Ubuntu Touch to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2UqDvXd
via IFTTT

vendredi 20 mars 2020

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Review: Max Performance without “Max” Flavor

Xiaomi’s smartphones are the epitome of affordability. The Redmi Note series enjoys the status of being one of the most popular budget smartphone series. A few years ago, any smartphone enthusiast would quickly choose the Redmi Note series when recommending a worthy performance-oriented and affordable smartphone. But since then, the smartphone market has become much more staggered, fragmented, and confusing. Almost every other smartphone company is now trying to surf the “affordability” wave, putting pressure on Xiaomi and its sub-brand Redmi. Adding to the intense competition is the fact that Xiaomi’s other sub-brand POCO has spun-off into an independent entity. So, with the overwhelming number of options now out there, is the recently launched Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro still the best device in the sub-$200 price segment?

xiaomi redmi note 9 pro review

Owing to the changes in the market, Xiaomi has evolved the Redmi Note series over time. The company first launched a Pro variant starting with the launch of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 series in India in 2018; it has now introduced the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max alongside the regular Pro variant. Curiously, the standard Redmi Note 9 is missing, but it’s possible it may launch in the near future. Nonetheless, the Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Max are almost identical; they have the exact same design, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G mobile platform, hole-punch displays, chunky 5,020mAh batteries, and even the same color variants. The features that set the Pro apart from the Pro Max are the resolutions of the primary as well as the selfie cameras, much faster 33W charging on the Max, and lastly, an 8GB RAM option for that Max performance boost.

Redmi Note 9 Pro XDA Forums ||| Redmi Note 9 Pro Max XDA Forums
Buy Redmi Note 9 Pro on Amazon India (Starting at ₹12,999)

Redmi Note 9 Pro/Note 9 Pro Max Specifications

Specification Redmi Note 9 Pro Series
Dimensions and Weight
  • 165.7 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm
  • 209g
Display
  • 6.67″ FHD+ (2400 x 1080) LCD;
  • Center-weighted Punch-hole display
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 5
SoC
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
    • 8nm process
    • 2 x Kryo 465 based on Arm’s Cortex-A76 @ 2.3GHz
      6x Kryo 465 based on Arm’s Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
  • Adreno 618
RAM and Storage
  • Pro Max
    • 6GB LPDDR4X + 64GB UFS 2.1
    • 6GB + 128GB
    • 8GB + 128GB
  • Pro
    • 4GB + 64GB
    • 6GB + 128GB
  • Dedicated microSD card slot for up to 512GB cards
Battery & Charging
  • 5,020 mAh battery
  • Pro Max: 33W fast charging
  • Pro: 18W fast charging
  • Respective fast chargers included within the box
Rear Camera Photo:
  • Primary:
    • Pro Max:
      • 64MP Samsung ISOCELL Bright GW1 sensor,
      • f/1.89,
      • 1/1.72” sensor
    • Pro:
      • 48MP Samsung ISOCELL Bright GM2 sensor,
      • f/1.79
  • Secondary: 8MP 119° Wide-Angle Camera, f/2.2
  • Tertiary: 5MP, Macro with autofocus
  • Quaternary: 2MP, f/2.4, Depth Sensor

Video:

  • 4K @ 30fps
  • 1080p @ 60fps
  • Ultra-wide: 1080p @ 30fps
  • Slow-motion: 1080p @ 120fps, 720p @ 960fps
Front Camera
  • Pro Max: 32MP
  • Pro: 16MP
Other Features
  • 3.5mm headphone jack
  • IR Blaster
  • Side fingerprint scanner
Android Version MIUI 11 based on Android 10

Following the India debut of the Redmi Note 9 Pro series, Xiaomi India sent us the 6GB+128GB variant of the Redmi Note 9 Pro for a review. So, here are my thoughts after a week of usage.

Redmi Note 9 Pro Design

The Redmi Note 9 Pro embraces the “Aura Balance Design” which combines serenity with symmetry. This design approach succeeds the “Aura Design” philosophy, which comprised 3D holographic designs paired with shiny colors. Xiaomi intends to design every phone they launch in 2020 with the Aura Balance Design, which can also be seen on the Xiaomi Mi 10 and the Mi 10 Pro, which are both launching in India soon. The new style statement lends the Redmi Note 9 Pro a much more premium and eye-catching appearance than previously launched devices in the series. The Redmi Note 9 Pro, as well as the Max, is being made available in Glacier White, Interstellar Black, and Aurora Blue colors, and their names are well descriptive of the inspirations for these colors. Xiaomi India sent us the black variant, but I prefer perceiving it as a shiny gray color that appears blue in sunlight.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The back panel – at least on the black variant we have – is highly reflective. It is shielded under a layer of Gorilla Glass 5, which while makes the phone feel sturdy, premium, and resistant to scratches, also adds to its weight and makes it more vulnerable to shattering from impacts. The glass panel also bears the Redmi branding near the bottom in symmetry to the single LED flash and the “48MP Camera” messaging just under the quad-camera setup.

Official LineageOs 16 on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro

Left: Redmi Note 7 Pro. Right: Redmi Note 8 Pro

The square camera module is strikingly different from the linear camera arrays used by Redmi on previous devices. The camera module sits atop a thick platform, which adds a few extra millimeters to the thickness of the Redmi Note 9 Pro. The camera module’s square shape has a couple of glaring advantages over linear arrangements as seen on the Redmi Note 8 Pro. First, it allows the phone to sit on a flat surface such as a table more firmly without causing any wobble when you tap on the display. Second, it makes the camera more of a subtle element and less in-your-face. The obround ring that encloses the two cameras in the upper row reminds me of Bender, the robot from the animated series Futurama.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The Redmi Note 9 Pro is quite heavy and weighs in at 209 grams, just one gram more than the POCO X2. While it feels heavy, the phone stays planted in the palm, so long as you’re not using a cover or a case. Using a thick case, such as the Silicone case included in the box, makes the phone almost spill out of my hands. I’m sure users with hands bigger than mine will not find this troubling. It is also worth noting that the Redmi Note 9 Pro is bigger, thicker, and bulkier than the Redmi Note 8 Pro.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The design of the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s frame resembles that of the POCO2 X2, with subtle differences in the placement of different elements. Just like with the POCO X2, the frame of the Redmi Note 9 Pro is made of plastic. It also comes with a fingerprint scanner on the right side, which is closer to the upper edge than on the new POCO. As a consequence, Redmi has also had to move the volume rocker up by a few millimeters.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The frame also accommodates a USB-C port, the primary microphone, and the mono speaker at the bottom of the phone along with a 3.5mm headphone jack which is still commonly found in this price segment. The Redmi Note 9 Pro also retains the IR blaster – a feature not found on many devices – on the top alongside the secondary microphone for noise cancellation. The left side of the phone features the SIM slot which houses a non-hybrid SIM tray capable of accommodating two SIM cards and a microSD card at the same time.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

There’s one unexpected addition to the smartphone, and that is a tiny white-colored notification LED nestled cozily in the earpiece grille. The notification LED, however, is not the first thing that grabs your attention when you’re looking at the Redmi Note 9 Pro from the front. What does grab your attention is the hole-punch display, which is next in line for discussion.

Redmi Note 9 Pro/Pro Max Display

The Redmi Note 9 Pro’s hole-punch display is designed to fascinate. It is not the first smartphone to feature a hole-punch LCD in this price segment – Vivo did it several months ago with the Z1Pro, and much more recently, several phones including the Redmi K30, POCO X2, Realme X50, and the Realme 6/6 Pro embrace the feature. However, the center-weighted hole-punch on the Redmi Note 9 Pro grabs your attention because it is tasteful and in line with the pro-symmetry and pro-balance design philosophy I mentioned earlier.Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The display measures 6.67-inches diagonally. While it is identical to the POCO X2’s display in size, there’s a noticeable difference between the color profiles of the two panels. The Redmi Note 9 Pro’s display appears relatively cooler and more saturated than the POCO X2. Side-by-side, the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s display also appears to be lower in brightness and this is corroborated by the official specification pages of the two phones. While POCO claims a maximum typical brightness of 500nits for the X2, Redmi’s official listing says the maximum typical brightness value for the Redmi Note 9 Pro is 450nits, 10% less than on the POCO X2. Despite this, daylight legibility isn’t a challenge for me, but you will not be able to enjoy content on the display in their truest colors. A sunlight trigger appears to boost the brightness and the contrast of the display when direct light from a strong source falls on it.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

The Redmi Note 9 Pro’s selfie camera is surrounded by a black boundary which is most likely to prevent the display’s backlight from causing any interference to the camera.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

Some discoloration can be easily observed along the upper and the lower edges of the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s display. This discoloration is much more evident when you’re looking at the display at certain angles. While the backlight of the LCD panel can also be seen seeping into the visible area of the display from the sides, this phenomenon is common with LCDs of average quality, and the color difference isn’t enough to pronounce it as edge bleeding. In certain apps that are not optimized for 20:9 displays, the hole-punch might also intersect the status bar.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

While competitors, primarily Realme as well as Xiaomi’s sister company POCO, are betting big on displays with higher refresh rates, Redmi is sticking to 60Hz refresh rate panels on not just the Redmi Note 9 Pro but also the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max. Therefore, you’ll miss out on a smoother scrolling experience, especially if you are comparing it to a gaming monitor or an acquaintance’s phone that supports that higher refresh rate mode. The 60Hz refresh rate may also be limiting for anyone considering to buy this for gaming. While the list of games that can run on frame rates higher than 60fps is currently small, we can expect to see more game developers embracing the feature over the year. In that scenario, Redmi Note 9 Pro users might be left out. If it’s any consolation, popular resource-hungry games like PUBG Mobile or COD Mobile might still not support higher FPS gameplay on mid-rangers such as this one.

Additionally, the display does not come with any sort of HDR certification. You do, however, get Widevine L1, but it is also stuck in a precarious position. During my review period with the Redmi Note 9 Pro, Full HD playback in OTT apps such as Amazon Prime Video and Netflix fluctuated for unknown reasons. In the DRM Info app, the Redmi Note 9 Pro shows contradicting results for the Widevine security level test. We checked with the Redmi team and they said that this is probably a bug and could be rectified with an OTA in the future.

DRM Info (Free, Google Play) →

To conclude this section, the display is overall satisfactory, and while the hole-punch may be a novel and exciting attribute for some users, the quality of the display is not exciting. It feels like a weak link in the otherwise strong stance that the Redmi Note 9 Pro shows.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro/Pro Max: Performance

On of the performance front, the Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G mobile platform, which was introduced only a few months ago. While the Redmi Note 9 Pro series is not the first device with this chipset – the Realme 6 Pro is the first device with the chip – it is the first device from Xiaomi or any of its sub-brands to have this chip. The Snapdragon 720G comes with a few minor improvements over last year’s Snapdragon 730/730G, and these include higher clock speed for the performance cores. Qualcomm has strategically named the chipset as well as the Kryo 465 cores – as opposed to Kryo 470 on the Snapdragon 730 series mobile platforms – even though they use the same Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 reference architectures from ARM. The chipset supports dual-frequency GNSS including India’s NavIC and Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX Adaptive.

Performance-wise, the Snapdragon 720G is on par with the Snapdragon 730/730G and even edges it out in certain cases. We performed some standard synthetic benchmarks to determine the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s performance and how it benefits from the new mobile platform. Since the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max also comes with the same hardware, we can expect similar performance from it as well.

Geekbench 5

Redmi Note 9 Pro max Geekbench

Starting with Geekbench 5, the cross-platform CPU-centric benchmark, we find that the Redmi Note 9 Pro puts up the best scores from within our test lot. It is almost neck-and-neck with the Realme 6 Pro, while also having a small advantage over the Realme X2 and the POCO X2, which are equipped with the Snapdragon 730G. Lastly, the Redmi Note 8 Pro (review) with a MediaTek G90T is left behind with the poorest performance in the bunch.

Geekbench 5 (Free, Google Play) →

CPU Throttling Test

The Redmi Note 9 Pro does not overheat much – or at least, the heat is not felt much due to the glass sandwich design. Although Xiaomi does not explicitly talk about a vapor chamber or internal cooling, there is minor throttling on the phone. We used the CPU Throttling test app, which repeatedly runs multiple threads (20 in our test) written in C language over a period of time (15 minutes in our test) to check if the CPU performance is throttled to prevent overheating in the system.

After running the test app in three different scenarios – with adequate battery, with low battery, and while charging above 90% (which is when the charging rate curve starts to flatten out). We find that there is only minor throttling (6%) when there’s sufficient battery. In comparison, the performance is much lower when the battery is low – in our test, the peak performance falls by 47%. Furthermore, the CPU performance is throttled to 88% of the peak performance while charging.

CPU Throttling Test (Free, Google Play) →

PCMark

Redmi Note 9 Pro PCMark

On PCMark Work 2.0, which simulates day-to-day tasks like editing documents, photos, videos, etc. or browsing the web and scrolling within apps, we see results inconsistent with the last test. The Redmi Note 9 Pro scores the lowest whereas the Realme 6 Pro, with the same chipset, scores the highest. The only plausible explanation for this is that our Redmi Note 9 Pro unit comes with 6GB of RAM while all the other devices in the comparison utilize 8GB RAM.

PCMark for Android Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

3DMark

Redmi Note 9 Pro 3DMark

The Redmi Note 9 Pro gets an Adreno 618 GPU which also powers the graphics performance on Snapdragon 730G devices. While the frequency of the GPU isn’t revealed by Qualcomm, it reached a maximum of up to 565MHz in our usage, as compared to the 575MHz clock speed of the Adreno 618 on Snapdragon 730G. In the GPU-intensive benchmark, 3DBench, the Redmi Note 9 Pro beats the Realme X2 and the Redmi Note 8 Pro while scoring the same as the Realme 6 Pro. We weren’t able to run the benchmark on the POCO X2, so it was dropped from the comparison.

3DMark - The Gamer's Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

GFXBench

Upon running the GFXBench’s Manhattan 3.1 battery test on the Redmi Note 9 Pro, we observed that while there is fluctuation in the performance during 30 iterations over a period of 30 minutes, there is no discernible pattern to account for any sort of GPU throttling. Throughout the test, the battery dropped by around 8% and there was a 9ºC increase in the temperature.

GFXBench Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

Androbench

Redmi Note 9 Pro Androbench ufs 2.1

Lastly, when it comes to the battle for the fastest storage, the Redmi Note 9 Pro doesn’t show any trend that’s out of the normal. All of these phones in the comparison come with UFS 2.1 NAND storage, and there isn’t much deviation other than on Realme phones which have much lower random write speeds.

Androbench (Storage Benchmark) (Free, Google Play) →

Gaming

To sum it all up, the Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max are among the best performing devices in this price segment. You won’t experience any jitter or lag in daily usage. While gaming, the chipset currently supports the “Ultra” frame rate (40fps) on PUBG Mobile but lacks support for HDR gameplay. The culprit for this, however, is Qualcomm and not Xiaomi or Redmi. The performance can be overclocked with the PUB Gfx tool but it might lead to some instability and the settings reset every time you exit the game. On top of that, there’s a constant fear of being banned if Tencent determines it as cheating. COD Mobile, on the other hand, runs the “Max” frame rate (60fps) at High graphics settings and “Very High” frame rate at “Very High” graphics. In either of the games at the default max settings, there is no lag of any sort and the heat generation is also minimal. The Redmi Note 9 Pro and Redmi Note 9 Pro Max, ergo, are pretty good devices for mid-tier gaming.

Haptic Feedback

Xiaomi has added a new Z-axis vibration motor on the Redmi Note 9 Pro series which results in quicker haptic feedback. There are different vibration profiles associated with different actions such as typing, navigation gestures, interactions with Quick Settings toggles, etc. The vibration motor feels smoother than on the Redmi K20 Pro and might add a whiff of premium experience to the mid-range. Unfortunately, there is no contextual vibration in games for actions such as shooting.

Battery

The Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max come with the largest battery in the Redmi Note series ever. The 5,020mAh battery breezes through the day and outperformed my expectations. The big battery easily delivers a two-day-long backup on moderate usage. In my usage, the battery lasted for around a whopping 60-hour period (2 days, 10 hours to be precise) with a screen-on-time of 8 hours. In another scenario, I pushed the screen usage to about 15 hours (by binge-watching videos) with the screen brightness set to auto and the phone still lasted 22 hours in total. That is both impressive and exciting.

When it comes to charging, the 18W charger provided with the Redmi Note 9 Pro takes about 90 minutes to go from 10% to 90%. After the 90% mark, the charging slows down significantly and the smartphone takes another 40 minutes to get to the 100% mark. Using a 27W charger from Xiaomi does not yield any better results even though the chipset does support Qualcomm’s Quick Charge 4.0.

In comparison, the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max is expected to charge much faster, owing to the 33W charging support. Since we don’t have a review unit yet, it is not feasible to test the performance.

Connectivity

In terms of connectivity, the Redmi Note 9 Pro supports LTE-Advanced with 3x carrier aggregation and 4×4 MIMO, Wi-Fi 6 with 8×8 MU-MIMO, and Bluetooth 5.1. The list of LTE bands supported by the smartphone is small because the phone is only available in India but might expand with more international releases. Here are the bands it supports currently:

  • LTE FDD:B1/3/5/8
  • LTE TDD:B40/41(2535-2655MHz)

In addition to the wide range of Global Satellite Navigation Systems (GNSS) supported by the Snapdragon 720G on the Redmi Note 9 Pro, the phone supports India’s NavIC. For better and more accurate navigation, the phone also supports dual-frequency GNSS, supporting a wide range of signal configurations including L1+L5 for the US’ GPS and Russia’s GLONASS, E1+E5a for Galileo, and B1+B2a for BeiDou.

The screenshots above show that among other satellite systems, the Redmi Note 9 Pro is also capable of receiving L5 signals from Indian navigation satellites. You can also test the same on your device using the GPS Test and the GNSSTest apps.

GPSTest (Free, Google Play) →

GNSSTest (Free, Google Play) →

Camera

The Redmi Note 9 Pro is equipped with a quad-camera setup, including a 48MP Samsung ISOCELL Bright GM2 as the primary sensor. This sensor is the successor to the Samsung GM1 and can also be found on other devices including the Samsung Galaxy M30s. The other cameras include an 8MP wide-angle camera with a 119º field of view, a 5MP macro camera with auto-focus, and lastly a 2MP depth sensor. On the front, the Redmi Note 9 Pro has a 16MP hole-punch camera for selfies.

Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we’ve left with no choice but to skip a detailed camera review for now and will be pursuing it when the situation eases out a bit. In the meantime, here are some images that were taken with the different camera sensors of the Redmi Note 9 Pro.

Primary

12MP vs 48MP

Night mode

Wide-angle

Macro

Selfies

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Cinematic portrait mode on Redmi Note 9 Pro

Conclusion

The Redmi Note 9 Pro is a charmer when it comes to looks and its serene Aura Balance Design is bound to attract eyes. In terms of specifications, it is a visible upgrade over the Redmi Note 8 and also the Note 8 Pro – except on the camera front. In that sense, the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max feels like the truer upgrade, even though the only upgraded attributes are the 5MP macro camera on the back and the 32MP selfie camera on the Max. If the camera is not your primary reason to upgrade your phone, the Redmi Note 9 Pro can be an excellent choice, but the sheer number of options in this price segment may compel you to think a bit more before finalizing your decision.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro review

If your budget is limited to ₹15,000 and you have a sense of favoritism towards the Redmi or Xiaomi brand, then the Redmi Note 9 Pro is a no-brainer. To be fair, the phone’s 4GB variant is a more attractive choice considering that it is the most affordable Snapdragon 720G smartphone on the market. In comparison, the 6GB variant feels like a more plausible choice and will serve you for longer. However, the 6GB variant may not be the best choice for your budget. If you can stretch your budget by ₹1,000, then the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max seems like the more lucrative option, and my primary reason for this is the 33W charging it supports.

Redmi Note 9 Pro XDA Forums ||| Redmi Note 9 Pro Max XDA Forums 

If you’re not emotionally attached to Xiaomi and can explore other brands, both the Realme 6 and the Realme 6 Pro come with 30W charging and 90Hz displays. If you consider buying a phone with 6GB RAM, the POCO X2 (review) seems like the almost perfect alternative as it gets a Sony IMX686 64MP camera, 27W charging, dual front cameras, and a marvelous 120Hz display to excite the gamer in you. Lastly, if you’re planning to buy a new phone to consume video content, there are some better options with Super AMOLED displays – the Samsung Galaxy M30s with a huge 6,000mAh battery just to name one. The Realme X2 is also another lucrative option but you might have to shell out some more bucks to make it yours.

In all, while the Redmi Note 9 Pro is a good phone, it shies away from being the best. Perhaps it is intentional and Redmi wants to sell more units of the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max. Further, its position in the reimagined Redmi Note lineup is a little confusing; while it is claimed to be a successor to the Redmi Note 8 Pro, it feels as if the Redmi Note 9 Pro is destined to be sandwiched between the successors to the Redmi Note 8 and the Redmi Note 8 Pro.

The Redmi Note 9 Pro Max will be available starting March 23rd while the Redmi Note 9 Pro has already had one flash sale and will have another on the same day. You might need good luck and better timing to buy a Redmi Note 9 Pro series phone so make sure you make your decision beforehand.

The Redmi Note 9 Pro is currently limited to India. For other markets, Xiaomi will be launching the Redmi Note 9S in Malaysia on March 24th which appears to be a rebadged Note 9 Pro.

Buy Redmi Note 9 Pro on Amazon India (Starting at ₹12,999)

The post Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Review: Max Performance without “Max” Flavor appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2whavJF
via IFTTT