LightBlog

samedi 7 janvier 2017

HMD Global announces the Nokia 6; its first Android Smartphone for the Chinese Market

While this year's Consumer Electronics Show is just about wrapping up, HMD Global has decided to unveil some rather exciting news – its first Nokia-branded Android smartphone. The company has issued a press release and promotional footage of the Nokia 6, giving us the first sneak peak of what HMD Global has been working on since they acquired the exclusive brand licensing rights from Nokia. There's only one catch – the smartphone will be launched only in China.

HMD Global cites the strategic importance of launching in the Chinese market given the potential growth of smartphone users expected in 2017. Furthermore, the company is banking heavily on the Nokia brand to bring success. They expect consumers to latch on to the premium build quality expected of a Nokia-branded phone and have also priced the device competitively within the Chinese market.


Meet the Nokia 6

A new Nokia 6 smartphone is seen in this handout image released by HMD to Reuters on January 7, 2017. HMD/Handout via Reuters

A new Nokia 6 smartphone is seen in this handout image released by HMD to Reuters on January 7, 2017. HMD/Handout via Reuters.

The device features a 5.5″ FHD screen with a layer of 2.5D Gorilla Glass. Internally, the smartphone is running on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 processor with an X6 LTE modem, 4GBs of RAM, and 64GBs of storage. There are also dual amplifiers on the device which are coupled with Dolby Atmos audio technology. The rear camera is a 16MP sensor with phase detection auto-focus (PDAF) and an f/2.0 aperture lens, while the front facing camera is a 8MP sensor. Finally, the phone is running on Android Nougat, which HMD Global states is "the latest version" so we'll have to assume that it is on Android 7.1.

Further details regarding the device can be gleaned from the promotional video posted on Nokia's website. We can't say much about the build quality until we can actually hold the smartphone with our own two hands, but we did notice that the device features a micro-USB port (clearly visible at 00:35 in the video) rather than a USB Type-C port as we've grown accustomed to lately. But given the fact that this device is a Chinese-exclusive, it makes sense for HMD Global to opt for the older USB port. In addition, it appears the phone will feature capacitive navigation buttons rather than on-screen buttons, while the physical home button doubles up as the fingerprint scanner.

HMD Global will be selling the device through its exclusive online retail partner, JD.com, for 1699 CNY sometime "in early 2017". This converts to approximately 250 USD, though we are unlikely to see the device priced exactly like this if, or when, it launches internationally.

We do hope that HMD Global eventually brings this device, or hopefully a device with better specifications, to other markets. Although many of us Android enthusiasts here at XDA have questions regarding whether or not HMD Global will commit to frequent updates or will not get in the way of development, there are also many people eager to see the revival of the Nokia brand and the design quality that has been missing in their absence.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2j4gZjx
via IFTTT

Recapping 2016: XDA’s Most Popular Opinions

As we counted down the remaining days of 2016, we asked you, our readers, to give us your opinion on a wide range of topics – from the best application, game, and smartphone of the year to the biggest disappointment of the year.

These discussions generated fervent debate among our readers – no surprise given the diversity of opinions colored by individual preferences, experiences, and location. While the more popular opinions garnered a lot of affirmative responses, we were surprised by the arguments presented in some of the minority viewpoints. Whether or not we agree with your view, we certainly appreciate the time and effort you've lent to voice your opinion and participate in the discussion.

Without further ado, let's look back at what readers of XDA answered the questions we posed during our '2016 in Review' discussion series:


Best App of 2016

For the first question in the series, we decided to start off a simple topic – What was the best app of 2016? Given the drought of highly publicized applications released last year, we decided against restricting discussion to apps released only in 2016, and instead expanded the scope to include any application that you found most useful.

The most popular opinion for the Best App of 2016 is the ever-popular third-party launcher –  Nova Launcher. We expected an application such as Nova Launcher to this category in the end, but nevertheless we couldn't help but nod our heads in agreement with our readers. Nova Launcher is among the most feature complete custom launchers, with the flexibility to run a no-frills minimalist setup or extensively customizing various aspects to mimic even the Pixel Launcher. Towards the end of the year, Nova Launcher also celebrated its 5th anniversary, which is where the stable builds brought many Pixel features and support for the latest Android 7.1 functionality such as launcher shortcuts.

Honorable mention also goes out to XDA Labs, our own in-house developed application distribution alternative, which also doubles up as a convenient way to access the forums and News Portal. It's free and ad-free, so there's nothing to lose in checking it out.

Best Game of 2016

Continuing the trend from above, we then asked you your opinion on the best game of 2016.

This particular topic attracted a plethora of differing opinions, which is quite understandable since mobile gaming has expanded to include thousands of titles and a multitude of different genres. Every individual has their own taste, and what one person may deem the best game may not be the best for another, but that's fine.

Some of the more popular opinions mentioned Critical Ops, Deus Ex GO, Vainglory and Clash Royale as their favorite games of the year. But the title of the best game of 2016 would have to go to Pokémon GO – love it or hate it, its popularity is undeniable.

Best Phones of 2016

Arguing over whose smartphone is better is a time old tradition of smartphone enthusiasts. Of course, given the wide variety of smartphones released each year, we had to segregate the Best Phone of 2016 category into three different price points: Best Flagship, Best Mid Ranger and Best Budget.

When it came to flagships, fans of the OnePlus 3 made their voice loud and clear. Though some might dispute the OnePlus 3 being included in the discussion given its price, the phone featured specifications that were highly competitive with other flagship devices at the time of its release. Coupled with its relatively low price, it should come as no surprise that so many people vouched for the device. Honorable mention goes to the ZTE Axon 7 as an oft-cited alternative to the OnePlus 3.

The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge also saw some love as the phone of choice for those of us with heavier coffers. Many users mentioned that they would have nominated the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 if it wasn't for the phone's explosive nature. To our surprise, the Google Pixel and Pixel XL saw relatively few mentions, as did the HTC 10. On the other hand, the Moto Z (and Moto Z family) did see some attention.

For mid range devices, the decision was more difficult to make. A few years ago, the debate was a lot more simple given the relatively little attention OEMs used to pay towards this segment. But Xiaomi pulled out all their stops with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (with the Snapdragon 650), and was our readers mid-range phone of the year. This is despite the fact that the device is priced in the budget category – it's just that good. Its performance is nothing like your typical budget phone, and I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly. The phone stands uncontested in the budget end, and by virtue of its performance, it makes for a great mid-range phone without the mid-range pricing.

Best Smartwatch of 2016

This was a tough question to ask, seeing that smartwatches did not have a stellar 2016. Sales were dropping and consumer interest was lowering, so naturally OEMs reacted by not releasing many new smartwatches.

The Samsung Gear S3 Frontier LTE did win out in the end, though. This is perhaps the only popular smartwatch that can fully function without needing a smartphone to babysit it. This smartphone-less, smart functionality is thanks to the watch's LTE support. The rest of the specifications sheet is impressive with features like the rotating bezel complementing Tizen OS UI navigation. While it's a shame that Samsung's Gear smartwatches do not come in Android Wear variants, perhaps this decision might actually be for the better.

State of Tablets in 2016

If you thought smartwatch options were limited, try naming the tablets released in 2016. It made little sense to ask the Best Tablet question here – there were barely any to choose from. The limited options gave way to limited sales and popularity, which is a vicious cycle that tablets have entered into.

That is a reason in and of itself why the Android tablet's decline persisted this year. Smartphones are getting bigger and our use for dedicated tablets are shrinking by the day with the advent of Smart TV's, smartwatches, and now Home Assistants. Furthermore, people find that tablets end up lasting much longer than smartphones, thus giving them less of a reason to buy a new one. With Chromebooks also entering the picture – and with Android application support to boot – we expect this trend to continue into 2017.

Honorable mention does go to the NVIDIA SHIELD K1, which many people agreed to be a good purchase within the current limited options, despite it not being a 2016 product.

Most Improved OEM of 2016

Given the popularity of the OnePlus 3 as mentioned earlier, we were not surprised to see OnePlus win the most improved OEM of 2016 category. This opinion comes derives from them bouncing back strongly after a dismal 2015. But due credit should go towards their attempt at an open smartphone platform, which helps soothe the wounds of the bitter Nexus enthusiast.

Honorable mention also goes to HTC. The HTC One M9 was caught in the crosshairs for the Snapdragon 810 debacle, but the HTC 10 flew under the radar despite how impressive it was. HTC's mid-range portfolio was rather lacking this year, with the OEM choosing to theoretically-refresh-but-practically-degrade this segment with the release of the HTC One A9s.

Worst OEM Decision of 2016

As was the general theme of 2016, we saw a lot of disappointing things happen this year.

The general consensus of our community was in naming the death of the Nexus line as the worst OEM decision last year. Google's decision to replace the Nexus with the Pixel brand meant spelled the death of the truly open device many enthusiasts had come to love. What happens for 2017 is still up in the air, but seeing how the Pixel duo are resonating better with the general audience than any previous Nexus phone ever did gives us little hope on a revival.

(Dis)Honorable mention goes to the removal of micro-SD card slots and the loss of the 3.5mm headphone jack in some devices. To be fair, the removal of micro-SD card support has been an ongoing process, so this does not really qualify. But on the other hand, the loss of the 3.5mm headphone jack port on some very popular phones, and the reported removal of the port on future phones in 2017 just leaves us with one word — Ouch!

Best Feature of Android in 2016

We saw two Android version releases this year: the major Android 7.0 update and then the minor Android 7.1 update. Many would agree that Android as an OS is a lot more mature than what it once was, but that does not mean we cannot not enjoy a new feature or two rolling out across the board.

Double Tap Recents to switch to the last used application won the best new feature of Android last year. This features increases the speed with which we multitask between applications. Granted, this feature has been available through custom ROMs and Xposed modifications for a while now, but it is always nice to see Google and OEMs bake these features directly into the stock OS.

Biggest Disappointment of 2016

This category was an interesting one to discuss. As is natural, we end up expecting a lot based on our needs and wants; only to end up with disappointed when something fails to live up to our expectation.

Surprisingly, the Google Pixel and the Google Pixel XL have been the biggest disappointment of 2016 according to our users. Users mentioned that they expected something more appealing in terms of build quality seeing as this was to be Google's answer to the iPhone. What we got was indeed Google's answer to the iPhone – but with the iPhone's signature large bezels and equally large price tag.

And of course, there's no way we can leave out the Samsung Galaxy Note 7. The phone was initially the exact opposite of disappointment, but public opinion quickly turned when news of the phone's explosiveness spread like wildfire.


2016 was a very eventful year and will be remembered for years to come. We would like to thank all our readers for supporting us through the year. Stay tuned as we kick start 2017 with more discussions – and let your voice be heard!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2iUAJce
via IFTTT

Google Talks About the Certification Process for Daydream at CES 2017

The virtual reality market has been booming in the past few months thanks to the success of the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive. Other companies are hoping to expand virtual reality to broader markets by introducing cheaper alternatives to the high-end, gaming centered VR products.

Google debuted their Daydream VR platform last year at Google I/O 2016, and they immediately began working on rules and guidelines that other companies should follow. This involved creating the Google Daydream Labs division which requires smartphone OEMs to have their device certified for the platform.

Google learned the hard way that OEMs will not always work to ensure their hardware performs in a satisfying way for the consumer. Thus, the company sought to introduce stricter rules that their partners would have to follow in order to be certified for the Daydream VR platform. To have a phone certified for Daydream, it must feature several hardware components and needs to pass a number of tests, most of which were outlined in the Android Compatibility Document for Android 7.0/7.1 Nougat.

At CES 2017, Google opened up a discussion regarding the certification process for smartphones to be Daydream VR ready. A big focus with Daydream hardware is the perception of lag, and Google's Amit Singh states one of the goals is to reduce the motion to photon latency into the 22ms-25ms range. This latency builds up from components such as the display, the sensor, and even the hardware, so there are multiple ways an OEM can reduce the latency and thus reduce perceived lag. Naturally, Google would prefer OEMs implement certain hardware that is proven capable for VR, but the company will make exceptions if the OEM is willing to cooperate and optimize their hardware for Daydream VR.

This is most evident in the recent announcement that the Mate 9 Pro and Mate 9 Porsche Design have become Daydream VR certified smartphones. There are currently three main requirements right now for Daydream certification: a GPU with the power to handle VR content, Android 7.0+, and an OLED panel. However, Mr. Singh states that Google is working with Huawei and some other companies to determine if some non-OLED panels can eventually be made feasible for Daydream VR.


Source: VRHeads



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2iOF4x0
via IFTTT

Pure Nexus ROM Available for the Google Pixel

The popular Pure Nexus ROM, based on AOSP Android 7.1.1, is now available for the Google Pixel. The ROM includes a mix of features, along with a focus on stability. Head on over to the ROM thread to know more!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2iompoJ
via IFTTT

New Phones with Old Android Versions: Why Security Patches & Feature Updates Lessen the Downsides

They say two things are inevitable, death and taxes; for us Android enthusiasts there is a third thing, and that's reading debates and complaints about OS updates… or lack thereof.

With billions of devices spanning the entire price spectrum, from hundreds of manufacturers in dozens of countries, it would come as no surprise that keeping such a large and diverse fleet of devices updated would be difficult — every company targets different audiences, with different means and resources, by offering different hardware configurations. This problem is compounded when large OEM's like Samsung and Huawei down to small ones like BLU and UMi seem dead-set on layering Android with added features that delay development of updates; even when OEMs decide to slim down their ROMs to allegedly speed up the process, manufacturers often fail to deliver on their promises. This has even caused newly announced devices to be launched with seemingly "out of date" Android versions, which immediately sets the user behind the curve and waiting for months to receive the latest and greatest. Sometimes this means waiting for half a year (like with the Honor 5X and Marshmallow) or a mere few months (as was the case with the original Moto G and KitKat). But should this really be a major cause of concern, or make us write off an entire device – and the hardware we ultimate most of the price for – because it isn't running the latest and greatest in terms features and software?


In the beginning of 2015 there was one surefire method of tracking updates across all OEMs, and that was the Android OS update version. Didn't have the most current release of Android, but wanted to know if you were secure? Well you were out of luck, as tracking the releases for security patches was all but impossible — some OEMs didn't update at all, and the ones that had minor updates (infrequently) didn't exactly detail what changed and for which reasons in terms of security. Release notes: Bug Fixes… This all changed in late 2015 following a series of massive security flaws and exploits that affected a significant proportion of Android devices in some shape or form, including the infamous "Stagefright", and these ultimately prompted Google and committed OEMs to deliver monthly security patches to address the biggest vulnerabilities.

screenshot_20170103-174929Google took security seriously and began the Android Security Bulletin that has been putting out updates since August of 2015. The real benefit of these bulletins and the security patch system are threefold. Firstly, it allows users to see how updated they are through the settings menu, instead of a largely ambiguous OS version which meant little to the actual security level. Second, it holds OEMs accountable to the user by not allowing them to hide behind the OS version or their own confusing particular patch numbers. Finally, it made security patches easier to push out by streamlining their release, making them more transparent, and also patching them on older Android releases — users no longer needed to be on the latest version of Android to get the latest protections, and prompting OEMs to keep track of devices regardless of whether they were running the newest OS enhanced users' prospects as well . These security patches have greatly improved Android, helping the brand itself alleviate the constant assault it suffered for flaws like Stagefright or the WebView vulnerabilities found by Metasploit. While the road was tough in the beginning, many OEMs are now pushing updates out for older devices at a fairly steady rate and many new devices launched with what could be considered an "outdated OS" are relatively current in terms of security.

As recent as a year ago a device getting an update that was not fixing a glaring user-facing issue or a major OS release was a rare sight; but today such updates are commonplace most often coming in sub-100MB patches. As OEM's push these updates to their devices there may also being device enhancing features such as the FM radio patch that T-Mobile Galaxy S7's saw early last year. What's more, even carriers are complying with these security patches. Bugs get squashed, features get added, and even battery improvements have all been seen coming with these security updates. Some OEMs running their own ROMs, such as EMUI or MIUI, can have their devices get the latest features in feature updates without necessarily upgrading the Android OS version, too. In terms of both features and security, jumping to a new Android dessert is no longer an absolute necessity.


So what am I saying? Are major feature releases suddenly less important and we shouldn't focus on these why buying a new phone or recommending one? In the past one of the primary reasons for obtaining OS updates was the enhanced security they brought. While major OS releases like Nougat and Marshmallow do have enhancements and benefits that cannot be brought to older OS releases by nature, the core of security improvements are available on older releases. Also too, many of the improvements and features brought to devices via major OS releases have been found in OEM skins in one shape or another, even if they might have been poorly implemented, and other UI improvements are superseded by OEM UI changes anyway. Night mode, display-size tuners, custom quick settings, multi-window and double tap to switch apps were seen in older releases brought by skins like TouchWiz or EMUI.

Not every phone is a Pixel, and not every user is an enthusiast. As an enthusiast group though, we demand the latest and greatest software and features, or we find ways of obtaining it ourselves (which is why we care so much about open bootloaders, but that's another story). But we are a very small piece of the market, and the mainstream market would rather have something that works than one that doesn't, but that runs the very latest software. Just ask Note 4 owners how rough those initial Lollipop updates went, or iPhone 4S owners running iOS9. A major benefit to security patches is that OS version updates to aging devices may negatively impact the user experience whereas security updates only stand to improve the safety and security with little in the way of negative side effects.

A year and a half ago, before Android Security Bulletins, OEMs needed to update their devices to provide the most updated security benefits so major OS versions were the end-all be-all. Today though, the Security Patch version should be more important to the end user than the OS version because even if you are running the latest OS, you aren't necessarily running the latest Security Patch. Instead of mocking OEMs for slow major feature releases or launching a device on a perceived "outdated OS", many OEMs should be commended for keeping devices on relatively current patch versions and in some cases rolling out patches before Google does. That's not to defend the skins or ROMs OEMs use (personally I'm not a fan) instead it is merely giving credit where credit is due. We could argue all day whether Samsung's vision of Android is superior to Huawei's, OnePlus's, or Google's, and there would be no clear winner.

Like it or not people like these OEMs' stock ROMs enough to continually purchase their products, and the discussion of these slowing down feature updates is a larger debate for another day. People who buy a device from the Galaxy S or Huawei Mate series are familiar with the look and feel of those respective brands, and our beloved AOSP feels alien to them. Fortunately, with the advent of security patches, users are no longer forced to live with an insecure OS to use what they really want… After all isn't Android's tag line, "Be Together Not The Same".



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2io8sqF
via IFTTT

Most of the Google Hangouts API is Being Killed on April 25th

The Google Hangouts API has been available for a while, and it's enabled various services to popup around Google's messaging platform. We've seen apps that let you draw on your face, letting you play a game of ping pong during a conference call, and more. However, these services and more will be shut down on April 25th as Google has announced they will be killing the API that powers them.

Many were shocked last year when Google announced the "replacement" apps for Hangouts known as Allo and Duo. It just seemed strange that instead of working to enhance their popular Hangouts messaging service, they decide to switch their focus to mobile-first ones. Once announced, Google informed the world that Hangouts would be relegated to an enterprise-centric solution from the company.

This week, while most people have their attention on CES products, Google has announced that they will be killing off the Google Hangouts API. Interestingly enough though, they won't be getting rid of it completely. The company's FAQ says the few exceptions to this rule will be for things like the ability to dial into a Hangout via DialPad and RingCentral, integrations with popular chat tools like Slack and then Hangouts on Air tools like Toolbox, Control Room and even Cameraman.

This is just the latest move from Google that allows them to focus more on enterprise consumers with Hangouts. This also gives more people motivation to use applications like Allo and Duo (as well as some other non-Google messaging platforms too).

What do you think of the new direction Google is taking Hangouts in? Do you wish they would have kept it as is (even if it meant less updates), or would you rather see Google kill Hangouts completely and focus on newer, more streamlined services?

Source: TechCrunch



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2jf4YXN
via IFTTT

Huawei Says They’re Adding Amazon Alexa to the Mate 9

At the start of November, Huawei officially announced the Mate 9, Mate 9 Pro, and the Mate 9 Porsche Design phones to the world. We had seen multiple rumors of this device leading up to the official announcement, so it wasn't a complete surprise when it was shown off to the public. Recently, Huawei announced they would be releasing the Mate 9 in the United States, and they were even at CES this year to show it off to the press.

At the electronics expo, Huawei revealed some interesting details about the device's launch too. While we have seen Amazon Alexa launched in a number of products lately, and it was a ton of products at CES this year, it hasn't been used in a smartphone that didn't carry the Amazon brand. Huawei wants to change with this with Mate 9, and says they'll be updating the software in the near future to add the service.

This is really interesting as we've seen reports recently that claim manufacturers are upset with Google for giving their own hardware preferential treatment when it comes to Google Assistant. Sure, you can use it in the Allo messaging application, but it's not baked into the OS like it is with the Pixel and the Pixel XL. So this could very well be the reason why Huawei has opted for Alexa with the upcoming release of the Mate 9 in the United States.

Amazon Alexa on the Huawei Mate 9 is said to compete head to head with the likes of Apple's Siri, Microsoft's Cortana, and Google's Google Assistant. Although, it's not known if it will be built into the core OS, or if it will just be a 3rd-party application loaded onto the phone. The report from FierceWireless says Huawei will be pushing the app to the device in an upcoming OTA update, so that suggests the integration won't be thorough.

It seems the personal AI assistant market is getting crowded these days, and even Samsung is rumored to launch their own soon as well. We would like to know which one you like the most in the comments section below!

Source: FierceWireless



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2iNL1u8
via IFTTT