LightBlog

lundi 19 décembre 2016

LG Says an LG V20 Bootloop was Caused by a Cheap USB Type-C Cable

Over the last few years, LG has had a serious issue with their smartphones going into a bootloop at seemingly random times. This didn't seem to be a huge issue with the Nexus 4, LG G2, or the Nexus 5, which are all manufactured by LG.

However, since the LG G3, there seems to be some underlying issue that is causing a bootloop on their smartphones. We've seen many reports about the LG G3, LG G4, LG G5 and the LG V10 all having some sort of bootloop issue.

It seemed like the reports of bootlooping devices increased with the release of the LG G4 and it was around this time when LG released an official statement about it. LG was quoted as saying that the LG G4 bootloop issue was caused by "a loose contact between components." Many have agreed with LG as they noticed the issue can be caused (as well as fixed in some cases) by heating up the device for an extended period of time.

We've also seen a number of issues surface around the new USB Type-C standard. Some OEMs have implemented USB Type-C into their phone in a way that has caused an issue with spec compliant USB Type-C cables. This has become such an issue that a new authentication spec was announced for new and upcoming USB Type-C cables. This was created so the customer knows whether or not a cable has been manufactured properly.

While we haven't seen many reports of the LG V20 bootlooping, there have been a few. An LG Service Center was able to take a look at one of these last week and they believe they know what caused the issue. The LG representative says the bootloop was caused by a cheap USB Type-C charging cable. However, a well known USB Type-C tester, Nathan K, says it is unlikely an issue caused by a USB Type-C cable "unless exceptional situations arose."

Source: iT Chosun (Korean)



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gTsRCr
via IFTTT

Unofficial AOSP 7.1.1 Nougat Lands on the MT6753-based Ulefone Metal

After bringing the latest Android to a bunch of MediaTek devices, Team M.A.D. has extended the Android 7.1.1 goodies to another phone: the Ulefone Metal. Head on over to the thread to find out more!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2hRxdvw
via IFTTT

ElementalX Kernel Available for the OnePlus 3T!

XDA Recognized Developer flar2 has brought his ElementalX kernel project to the OnePlus 3T. The ROM is centered around stability and includes many features like sweep2wake, sound control and advanced color control.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gSFtKe
via IFTTT

The Story Behind the UMi Z

This has been a breakout year for Chinese upstart UMi. In 2016 they've put their efforts into developing global markets and creating products for people around the world. Starting with UMi Touch, the first user-defined smartphone from the company, they been responding actively to the feedback from their customers. Their top products this year have been the Umi Super, Max, Plus and Plus E, many of which we've written about on XDA.

2016 UMi Z

2016 UMi Z in silver

UMi's latest high-end smartphone is the Z, and the company has gone to great lengths to make the phone as impressive and premium as possible, all while not going into flagship-price territory. That's one of the things we like most about UMi–their devices offer really great features and specs at low prices.

When it comes to the specs, the Z packs the Helio X27 Deca-Core CPU clocked at 2.6GHz, the top tier of the X20 family. This SoC is available exclusively for LeEco (Chinese market) and UMi (Global market) at launch.

The processor uses the Tri-Cluster CPU architecture which allows the CPU to activate the most powerful cores only when necessary, while using the more energy-saving ones for simpler tasks. This is a good solution for having power when needed and reduced energy consumption when we use the phone lightly.

The battery is a 3780mAh unit and is made by Sony. Why not go for 4000mAh, which has been the battery capacity of most recent UMi phones like the Super and the Plus/E? According to the company, this slightly smaller unit allows a better optimized internal space and dimensions, and reduced body weight. Moreover, since the X27 has the tri-cluster technology for optimizing power consumption, overall battery duration is better than many 4000mAh phones in the market. And with PE+ fast-charging, it doesn't take long to power up the phone.

umi1

For the Z, UMi had more room for internal components which allows for better thermal management. A lot of processes and state-of-art machines were used to craft the premium body.

For cameras, UMi equipped the same 13mpx Camera with Samsung S5K3L8 sensor both on the front and the back of the phone. You can always take high quality selfies thanks to the great sensor, even in low light. The rear camera has PDAF and Laser stabilization so you won't have to worry about blurry pictures. Focus is immediate and noise is reduced also thanks to the latest Mediatek ISP technologies. With four LEDs used in the flash lamp, the scene will always be bright with natural colors, allowing nice photos taken in various light condition.

umi2

The UMi Z includes the premium NXP TFA9890 speaker driver IC, which enables 9.5V boost voltage from an integrated DC/DC converter. Increasing the voltage headroom in the audio driver IC prevents amplifier clipping and keeps sound quality high at maximum volume.

The 5.5″ FHD display manufactured by Sharp is a high color-saturation 95% NTSC gamut unit with 17% better overall color saturation for a richer viewing experience. The display is protected by Dragontrail glass.

This phone is shipped with android Marshmallow but is expected to receive a Nougat update within the coming month.

Pre-sale will start on the 26th of December. The listing price is $279.99. You can visit UMi's website and participate to the "subscribe surprise" event, where you will obtain a special prize if you purchase UMi Z after participating.

Thank to UMi for sponsoring this post.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2hM0YB2
via IFTTT

dimanche 18 décembre 2016

Theme Your Phone With Substratum

Substratum is one of the hottest theme engines out right now. This video is a bit of an introduction to this theme engine and an explanation of what it can do. Follow our expanding playlist of videos focused on homescreen design here.

sub1

sub2

rub3

 

Follow the official thread on the XDA forums.

Download Substratum on the Play store here:



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2i4BN9b
via IFTTT

A New Router Experience: Google Wifi Is a Surprisingly Polished and Underrated Google Product

This October's multi-Google-device launch brought us a better glimpse at the now-released Google Assistant, arguably the most talked-about Google project of the year. Months later and with the release of the Pixels and Google Home, discussion on Google's new ecosystem has only grown louder.

All the buzz surrounding Google's AI works, smarthome developments and incursion into virtual reality overshadowed what was received as one of the most boring announcements Google made in 2016 — Google Wifi. These are tiny and inconspicuous Wi-Fi routers which Google showed alongside its more-ambitious projects, and given that the routers and service have taken a while to arrive to the masses, not much has been discussed since. Indeed, on its face Google Wifi is essentially a router, albeit one that aims to be fast and reliable for its $129 price-point, and also one that's very easy to mesh with other Google Wifi pucks. Even then, though, not many of us care much about our routers — we often take them for granted, and they mostly sit in a corner of our house, unattended and unnoticed, for the majority of their lifespan. A router is hardly something to get excited about, yet Google felt it was its duty to make not one, but three of these things: before the tiny white Google Wifi, we had (and have) the towering OnHub routers by TP-LINK and ASUS. Back then, Google's efforts at marketing a better "router experience" (whatever that means) were even lamer than they were today,  but those devices did kindle some level of curiosity on certain enthusiast subgroups.

I happened to be one of the few that jumped aboard the Google OnHub, with a reasoning surprisingly similar to what Google intended from its target demographic: I was moving to a new neighborhood, finally being able to access sweet Fiber internet, and I wanted to make the most out of it. However, given I have a girlfriend obsessed with the aesthetics of our home, placing a traditional router in the middle of our house (for optimal coverage) wasn't something she was willing to accept, and the less antennae and cables it had (or the less it looked like a spider) the better. The OnHub looks surprisingly pleasant for a router, and I also wanted to give its "smarter" network management and app a go. Plus, I was very interested in what Google could do with the device in the future given it had so much unused hardware at the time, not to mention an interesting software foundation. We even have (pretty dead) Google OnHub forums here at XDA, so as a Google Services user, I had all the excuses to buy into this wacky experiment.


How Can a Router be More Engaging?

Almost a year has passed since I bought my OnHub, and I must have interacted with the physical device no more than three times since. It was very much the "fire and forget" setup that Google advertised in this regard– they made setting up an internet router as simple as it can possibly get. Network speeds have been expectedly great, and I haven't had a single complaint regarding my internet… something extremely satisfying after living in the third world for twenty years. But none of that is necessarily exceptional or out of the ordinary for an expensive router, and I would say that great coverage and consistency alone probably wouldn't justify the hefty $200 price I paid for my OnHub. Truth be told, most routers at that price should give you the same level of "internet quality", only perhaps with a bit more effort and fine-tuning. The OnHub's strengths and uniqueness ultimately don't come from traditional router functionality anyway, and I grew happier with each OnHub app update bringing new features and more polish, leading up to the point where the app finally turned into Google Wifi with the release of the new router. 

google-onhub

"The Google Wifi app is extremely easy to use and tidily organized"

This brings us to what makes Google Wifi so great: the mobile app and everything it allows you to do. To be even more specific, how simple everything is and how useful its features are. The Google Wifi app is extremely easy to use and tidily organized, menus and interactions flow great, and it looks fantastic to boot.

I would go as far as calling it my favorite Google app in terms of design and considering what it's supposed to do (which it pulls off magnificently, in my opinion), as I've never experienced any bugs or odd app mechanics and every update has made it more feature-rich without muddying up the user experience. But what makes Google Wifi as a service so special?

onhub2 onhub1 onhub3 onhub4

The setup process is the first thing that stood out to me, as it was done entirely on the app and it was as simple as setting up any Google product, like the Chromecast or Google Home. After that's done, the app greets you with a simple screen showing a diagram of your internet, router and connected devices, and tapping on any of them will bring up more information. For example, by tapping the internet icon you can access usage statistics going back to 60 days, and you can also view usage in real-time. The router also runs routine speed tests and keeps a log of your network speeds on each day. All of this is useful to understand your usage, but it's not something you wouldn't find on other routers — it's just simple to use, easy to access and nicely displayed. The same goes for the screen showing your connected devices, where you can easily check up on what kind of traffic each of your gadgets sees, or has seen over the past couple of months. Each device can also be expanded individually to better track download and upload statistics, or prioritize it for faster download speeds (this can also be automated or scheduled). Of course, you can also kick or pause devices on your network.

onhub-speedtest

The Google Wifi app also has an "Assistant" tab to inform you of recent changes and the new features that arrive to the service. The right-most tab of the main view hosts a variety of features: one of the more useful ones is a quick network check, which you can use to test either your internet speeds or the network strength of your particular device at range. A neat touch to the speed tests is a little graph telling you of what your internet is capable of based on its speed, informing users whether they can, for example, stream 4K video without issues.

pauseThere are also a couple of useful and well-implemented features, such as the ability to put devices in groups to temporarily pause their internet connection — Google mostly aims this feature at parents wanting to get their children to do their homework, but I can see other usecases being adopted by non-parents (cheeky example shown to the side). Setting up a guest network is also very easy on Google Wifi, and you can easily copy or share the network's password from the app. An interesting feature which has been very useful when hosting parties or having friends over is the ability for people on guest networks to even access certain Google Wifi features and home device control.

on-here

This is done through the OnHub's web platform, accessed by going to "on.here" on a browser while connected to a network. From here, guests can access your controllable devices should they want to easily stream a video or control your house lights — that's right, Google Wifi can integrate with Phillips Hue, and the on.here hub allows any device with a browser to easily manage all of the connected lights, including the ability to change their color through an extremely simple interface. Is this overkill? Perhaps. Is it useful? Certainly, and I personally enjoy the ability to control my lights from my browser on my computer, as it's sometimes easier than taking out my phone or yelling "OK Google" across the room. These little conveniences are the kind of touches that make Google Wifi a valuable experience, even if they aren't particularly unique.

googleonhub

IFTTT integration is also a nice feature that Google Wifi allows for, and while recipes are limited, the potential for automation is there. I personally have mine set to log every device that connects or disconnects to the network, so that I can better keep track of whether I was home or not at a particular time. Finally, the OnHub has gained better configuration over time as well — while you can't customize to the degree that other premium routers allow for, you still can tweak DNS and WAN settings, forward ports, etc. Also, granting network management privileges to a house mate or significant other is extremely simple and only requires the person's e-mail, and the app only needs your Google account to manage the network, so setting it up on new devices or ROMs is as easy as downloading the app again.


A Great User Experience Powering Your Home Internet

Google's incursion into the router space of all places might have sounded odd a year ago, and while many dismissed the OnHub as a simple companion to their Fiber efforts, few would predict it'd become the foundation for a new proper service – Google Wifi – that would neatly integrate into their Internet of Things strategy. The Google OnHub and Wifi routers are still not as interesting as Google Home or a new smartphone, but I am also pleasantly surprised at the level of quality and satisfaction that the experience provided to me. It's undoubtedly well-made with a nifty app and extremely accessible features — I personally know friends and family who dread dealing with router issues, from resetting a network to forwarding ports. To my older relatives, their routers are mysterious black boxes with blinking lights and a mesh of cables behind them. The OnHub and Google Wifi routers solve this problem on every level — from their inconspicuous appearance to their simple setup and network management options. It might not offer the same level of granularity as a top-of-the-line router, but for people who want the best out of their home Wi-Fi with as little hassle as possible, Google Wifi is surprisingly effective.

I have a strange feeling of excitement for my router's future updates

And this is, perhaps, the biggest surprise: I've been routinely disappointed by Google releases these past couple of years, and our community does have a tendency to overhype each and every new Google thing. With Google Wifi, the story is different — it wasn't discussed much, even after the update properly hit the OnHub and the new hardware went on sale. It's great that Google didn't abandon their OnHub platform and delivered on its promise of software updates, and after the last major changelog, I have a strange feeling of excitement for my router's future updates. That's the magic of Google Wifi if there is any at all: the router goes from a passive instrument in your house to something you can easily interact with, customize, make the most out of, accessible and that gets better over time. And unlike Google Home, the OnHub in particular has been great from the start — barring some unavailable configuration options, it has never failed me thus far, and updates have added cool features like IFTTT integration and now the Google Wifi features and revised app, additions I only half-expected given Google's support track record.

The OnHub and Google Wifi offer the rare kind of service that simplifies a process so much that it actually becomes more engaging, and makes you want to interact with the product more frequently as a result. I find myself opening the Google Wifi app at least once a day, whereas I never really interacted with my routers or Wi-Fi settings in the past unless I had to fix an issue or forward a port for gaming. In this sense, Google Wifi is transformative: it made the cumbersome Wi-Fi management experience more attractive and even fun; other routers might be able to ultimately achieve the same features, but Google's solution is intuitive and integrated into their ecosystem in a way that makes everything flow extremely well. I never thought I'd ever write an editorial on how much I enjoy my fidgeting with my router, so in this sense, Google Wifi has been the "sleeper hit" of 2016 for me.

Check out XDA's Google OnHub Forum!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2hO46cG
via IFTTT

samedi 17 décembre 2016

Report: Samsung Galaxy S8 may feature Fingerprint Scanner on the Back

With the initially highly anticipated Galaxy Note 7 exploding in Samsung's face, a lot of attention is being focused on Samsung's next flagship: the Samsung Galaxy S8.

Earlier this week, we learned about the existence of Synaptics' new optical-based fingerprint sensor which is stated to offer high-resolution fingerprint scanning through 1mm of full cover glass. The sensor is expected to go into mass production in Q2 2017, with samples being shipped to smartphone manufacturers during Q1 2017. Some have suggested that this sensor may be seen in the upcoming Galaxy S8, but with the upcoming Samsung flagship expected to be announced at Mobile World Congress at the end of February 2017, the timelines don't seem to match up.

That's not to say the Galaxy S8 won't feature Synaptics' new fingerprint sensor, but that we're merely operating off of rumor and speculation if we assume that it is. There's nothing wrong with a little bit of rumor now and then, provided that the speculation appears somewhat grounded in reality. Hundreds of Android related rumors circulate the web each day, but most are based on little to no evidence. In the occurrence that we do cover a rumor, it is because the idea seems plausible – though as with all rumors, it might not come to fruition. That being said, there is a new report out from the news section of the highly-popular South Korean web portal Naver that states the Samsung Galaxy S8 may feature its fingerprint scanner on the rear of the device.

An industry insider spoke to Naver regarding the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S8. In the report, the insider mentions that Samsung may forego the home button entirely and feature its fingerprint scanner on the back. Furthermore, the iris scanner found on the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 may return on the Galaxy S8 – not without its fair share of improvements, however. In addition, Samsung is said to re-launch its Samsung Pass service using its iris recognition technology.

Now, given the fact that every Samsung Galaxy device has had a home button, this rumor may seem far-fetched. Apple has had a home button on their iPhones from the very beginning as well, but that company recently made very significant changes to their home button with the latest iPhone. On iOS devices, it's the norm to see devices with physical home buttons. On Android devices, Samsung is technically the odd one out with their continued use of a physical home button. Rear fingerprint scanners already exist on many Android devices, such as most Huawei phones equipped with a fingerprint scanner and the new Google Pixel phones. Finally, with the rumored re-introduction of the iris recognition scanner which resides on the front of the device, we can see how Samsung would justify removing the home button.

Of course, as we've mentioned before, a rumor is a rumor. None of this information is confirmed until we see actual production models of the phone out in the wild (unlikely) or we wait until Samsung officially unveils it in 2017. But it's nice to speculate once in a while about what features upcoming flagships might rock.

Do you prefer a fingerprint scanner on the front or back of the device? Are you in favor of physical or software navigation keys? Let us know below!


Source: Naver (Korean)

Via: SamMobile



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2hvS7D5
via IFTTT